Answer:
On January 1st, the $3,000 could buy 10,000 Swiss francs (3,000/0.3).
On June 1st, the $3,000 would buy 7,500 Swiss francs (3,000/0.4).
Explanation:
On January 1st, each Swiss francs could only purchase $0.30 while on June 1st, each Swiss francs could purchase $0.40.
These show that the Swiss francs had appreciated in value relative to the US Dollars with a positive change of 33%. Therefore, the dollar had weakened against the Swiss francs by the same rate.
When a firm is experiencing lesser profit it can come up
with different strategy to improve its present product rather than developing
new product because improving present product involves lesser cost therefore
more profit. The answer is B. Product Extension and C. New product placement.
Reintroduction is one way, it is launching the product
using more creative sales and marketing strategy. It can target a new market segment,
provide more information about the product and use more appealing
advertisements. The product’s packaging can also be changed to make it look
more attractive and fresh.
Product
extension can be use as it is targeting a new market. It can
involve exporting the products. This strategy may be costly but when successful
will level up your product’s quality as it passed exporting quality. It is
changing the market NOT the product.
New
product Placement is a strategy where in the products are
advertised by placing it in media. The products are shown for example in
movies, the character uses the products that way it can give awareness to the
viewers how the products can be used and also the brand and name of the
products are advertised without direct reference to the product. It doesn’t
involve changing the product’s feature only the product placement is changed to
a new one.
<span>Rebranding can also be used. It is introducing your
product with a new name, changing the product’s name not only its packaging but
the total appearance. It gives the product a whole new image to target new
image audience or expand its audience.</span>
Answer:
Optimal package size = 4 units
Optimal package price = $20
Explanation:
P = 8 - 1.5Q and C(Q) = 2.0Q, MC = 2
To obtain optimal package size, we put
Price is equal to the marginal cost, P = MC
8 - 1.5Q = 2
1.5Q = 6
Q = 6 ÷ 1.5
= 4
Therefore,
Optimal package size = 4 units
Hence,
Optimal package price:
= 0.5[8 - 2] × 4 + 2 × 4
= 12 + 8
= $20
Answer:
a. a grant will be secured to help fund the project.
Explanation:
In project management, a project manager can be defined as an individual or organization that temporarily undertakes a project in order to create a unique result, product, and service. Project managers strives very hard so that they can achieve their aims, goals and objectives in the most cost-effective, efficient and best manner through the use of unique set of interrelated tools, skills and tasks.
An assumption for a construction project could be, a grant will be secured to help fund the project.
Project managers sometimes embark on the execution of projects without having enough fund to finish it successfully. There assumptions are usually that once they have commenced the process, a grant can be secured from creditors, investors or financial institutions to help fund the remaining part of the project. However, since it is an assumption, they're not guaranteed that the grant will be given to them; therefore, this can result to the stalling of projects sometimes.
By virtue of standards, materials to be used to construct the building, the size of the building that is to be constructed and the regulations and codes required for the building should never be assumed by project managers.