The U.S. Supreme Court strikes down a state law as unconstitutional.
Judicial Review refers, primarily, to the Supreme Court's power to review legislative or executive action to determine whether the branch acted Constitutionally.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. As a result of the Supreme Court's ruling in Mapp v. Ohio, the court expanded the rights of the accused.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court ruling in Mapp v. Ohio in 1961 came to strengthen the rights of defendants in criminal cases in state courts. Thus, the Court established that the Fourth Amendment guarantee by which defendants have the right to protection against unreasonable searches and seizures (meaning by those searches carried out without a judicial order) was also applicable to the states, through the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In the case, Dollree Mapp had been convicted by the state of Ohio based on evidence obtained without the necessary search warrant, making the Supreme Court illegitimate all the evidence in the case.
This is easily explained with the fact that the Egyptian people were farming along the river Nile and waited for the flooding cycle which brought increased amounts of water from the mountains as the snow was melting. Due to this, they could arrange their seasonal working rhythm of growing crops according to the flooding cycle and could prepare for increased amounts of water which they could use to help grow their crops.
B I believe. msg me if you still need help.
A poor man who commits murder should be punished the same as a wealthy man who commits murder.
