1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yulyashka [42]
3 years ago
11

Who was in charge of cuba until 1959, and was seen as a u.s-backed dictator

History
1 answer:
Usimov [2.4K]3 years ago
3 0
The answer must be putin
You might be interested in
how would you know the reasoN in the following cases 3.we should not keep the milk outside on a hot day because​
Stella [2.4K]

Answer: Because it will not be good.

Explanation: If you were to drink that then you can get really sick and you might have to be in the emergency room

7 0
3 years ago
America comes of age
FromTheMoon [43]
America began in July 4th, 1776 which would make it 243 years ago.
3 0
2 years ago
In the years leading up to world war 2, how were germany's and japan's goals similar?
scZoUnD [109]

Answer:

they both wanted to expand their empires by conquering neighboring countries

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What are large groups within Christianity that share certain beliefs and rituals but disagree on others?
ratelena [41]

Answer:The domain of religious inquiry is characterized by pervasive and seemingly intractable disagreement. Whatever stance one takes on central religious questions—for example, whether God exists, what the nature of God might be, whether the world has a purpose, whether there is life beyond death—one will stand opposed to a large contingent of highly informed and intelligent thinkers. The fact of extensive religious disagreement raises several distinct philosophical questions. One significant question arises within the context of political philosophy: may religious conceptions of the good and the right legitimately ground one’s political convictions in a pluralistic society marked by diverse and often conflicting religious convictions? Other questions concern the possibility of reconciling disagreement data with specific religious beliefs. For example, can persistent religious disagreement be squared with the conviction of many Christians and other theists that God “desires everyone to be saved and to come to knowledge of the truth” (I Timothy 2:4, NRSV)? These and other important questions will not be taken up here. The focus of this article is the epistemic challenge raised by religious disagreement: does awareness of the nature and extent of religious disagreement make it unreasonable to hold confident religious, or explicitly irreligious, views? Many philosophers have answered this question in the affirmative, arguing that the proper response to religious disagreement is religious skepticism. Others contend that religious conviction may be reasonably maintained even in the face of disagreement with highly qualified thinkers.

Reflecting on the epistemic challenge posed by religious disagreement readily leads one to questions concerning the epistemic significance of disagreement in general, religious or otherwise. One might think that religious disagreement does not raise any distinctive epistemological questions beyond those that are addressed in a more general work on disagreement. There are, however, features of religious disagreements that present problems that, for the most part, are not adequately addressed in such a work. These features include the lack of agreement on what skills, virtues, and qualifications are most important for assessing the questions under dispute; the fact that many of the disputed beliefs are arguably epistemically fundamental; the significant evidential weight that is assigned to private experiences; and the prominence of practical or pragmatic considerations in the justifications offered for opposing viewpoints. While these features taken individually may not be exclusive to religious disagreements, the fact that they frequently coincide in religious disputes and are especially salient in such disputes makes religious disagreement a worthy epistemological topic in its own right. The bulk of this article will focus on these problematic features of religious disagreements and the special questions they raise.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Patrick Henry made this statement in his speech at the Virginia Ratifying Convention. The purpose of the speech was to explain w
likoan [24]

Answer:C

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the columbian exchange shape global economies and societies?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did native Americans build mounds.
    8·2 answers
  • How did Islam influence the government of the Mughal Empire
    11·2 answers
  • How might our world be different today had Constantine never existed?
    11·2 answers
  • The role of the president has evolved over time because
    7·2 answers
  • 2. What is contained in the Tripitaka?
    5·1 answer
  • How did the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists feel about the Constitution? Use the information from the reading and class tod
    7·1 answer
  • How did american involvement in vietnam change under president johnson and nixon?
    12·1 answer
  • During the civil war cotton diplomacy was
    6·1 answer
  • A culture is a shared set of beliefs and customs. True False
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!