1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serga [27]
2 years ago
15

The case of Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints v. United States did all of the following except

:
A:Dissolved the Church as a legal entity.

B:Upheld the seizure of the Church's assets because it encouraged its members to practice polygamy.

C:Gave the federal government legal custody and title to temples and other holy sites through a receiver.

D:Prohibited Mormons from holding public office in the Utah Territory.
History
1 answer:
Angelina_Jolie [31]2 years ago
8 0

D: prohibiting Mormons from holding public office in the Utah Territory.

You might be interested in
Nalle was married to _____.
Rus_ich [418]
Maby it was  b  b is the best
3 0
3 years ago
To what degree is it understandable for England and France to pursue a policy of Peace through Appeasement?
Llana [10]

Answer: Appeasement was the right policy for England because it gave them time to prepare and get there army together. Appeasement allowed them to have peace and no conflict for a while which is a good outcome of appeasement. Lord Halifax even promoted appeasement because it allowed them to prepare for the war which happened within a year.

Explanation: It's understandable that having peace through appeasement would put England in advantage during the war and France could focus on theirselves.

3 0
3 years ago
Who did James Curry run away with?<br><br> Who, not How.
yulyashka [42]

Answer:

He ran away with his two brothers, but he was separated from them when they made their way to the North.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Why did colonists feel the Articles of Confederation were necessary even though the Declaration of Independence was already writ
Finger [1]

<em>D. The Declaration of Independence outlined a relationship between individuals and the government but did not detail the power and control of that government.</em>

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was known for its many weaknesses. It gave little to no power to the central government, which made Americans eventually uneasy and lead to the creation of the Declaration of Independence.

The Articles was very weak and granted the central government barely any power that it needed. The government could not tax the states, they had to out right ask the states for money. This lead to the United States not being able to pay off war debts, or other important things that were valuable to keeping up a country. The government also couldn't regulate trade, which was very important during this time and keep up the wealth and importance of the United States. They also couldn't do things such as enforcing laws and passing new laws, they needed many of the states approval before doing anything.

The people who were in support of creating a new constitution were the Federalists, but those who wanted to keep a small government were called Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were most likely scared of a big government because they didn't want the government to abuse their power. They didn't want a repeat of what happened with Great Britain, with "<em>taxation without representation</em>" and not letting people voice opinions, practice different religions, or pass absurd laws that would overall damage individuals. Federalists felt that keeping the government this way was hurting the United States and they should be represented by a big government, obviously not one that was abusive, but one that could get things done while still having the people in mind.

When the Declaration of Independence was created, most of the people focused on the relationship between the government and the people, as it was a hot topic in the past. Many people wanted to make sure the government would not get out of hand and to maintain the good relationship between having a bigger government and the wishes of the American citizens.

Many people also felt that the Articles of Confederation was still needed, as that properly dictated how much power the government could hold, while the Declaration of Independence mostly focused on the relationship between the individuals and the government.

3 0
3 years ago
How r u guyss do yall have tt
AlexFokin [52]

Answer:

yup but review brainly's policy for posting educated questions, you could recive a warning and enough of those your account will be removed.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A limitation on the presidents power to appoint ambassadors in that
    7·1 answer
  • Define what Trotskyism is.
    11·2 answers
  • Which empire included the territory that is now part of Turkey, Greece, and Egypt? A. Ottoman B. Safavid C. Mughal
    14·2 answers
  • What is effectual demand, and why is simply wanting a product not enough to create an effectual demand for it?
    10·1 answer
  • How was Muhammad’s message received in Mecca and in Medina?
    10·1 answer
  • MAJOR HISTORICAL CONFLICT THAT RESULTED<br> IN AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following pairs of founders is considered by "their" religion to be God in human form?
    12·2 answers
  • What did Romans living in the eastern Mediterranean viewed early christians as ?
    15·2 answers
  • Who was the man most responsible for the notes from the convention and with basic framework of the constitution
    6·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE!!! Think about America and the world today. Give an example where the United States has not
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!