The correct arrangement of the events chronologically in <em>To Build a Fire</em> is:
- The man is given advice and a warning by the old timer about travelling alone in such low temperatures.
- The man continues his journey up the left fork.
- He arrives at the fork.
- The man heads up the trail with the dog with only light supplies.
- The man's foot goes through the ice and he is wet.
- The dog puts its foot through the ice.
- Now increasingly aware of the cold, the man lights a fire and eats his sandwich.
- The fire is put out by snowfall from the tree above.
- With great difficulty, he lights another fire.
- The man tries to kill the dog.
- The dog leaves.
- The man freezes to death.
<h3>What is a sequence of events?</h3>
This is known to be the order in which events take place in a story.
Hence, we can the chronological order in which the story is told reveals the journey of the man with his dog, building a fire, and the sad turn of events which led to the death of the man due to the cold temperature.
Read more about <em>sequence of events </em>here:
brainly.com/question/1620200
#SPJ1
Fossil fuel companies should pay for climate change because, it only makes sense that the companies that have helped fuel the climate crisis should be cleaning up their share of the mess.
Discussion:
Growing up, we all learned an important, simple principle: Clean up your own mess.
As transitioning to renewable energy becomes more urgent to control the worst effects of climate change, the government needs to raise funds to help build a more sustainable country and world.
In essence, it only does make sense that the companies that have helped fuel the climate crisis should be cleaning up the mess they started.
Read more on climate change:
brainly.com/question/14432787
Answer:
flat, they were focused on building their houses so the wolf wouldn't blow it down
"If you are like me, such a law would be a catastrophe and would only mean one thing: the end of life as we know it"
Illogical conclusions shows a cause-and-effect relationship that does not exist, based on something that doesn't make sense. To find an illogical conclusion, you can ask how the initial information is linked to the final conclusion. Is there any information that supports it?
