Answer:
Not particularly.
Explanation:
I honestly can't even keep track of time nowadays though.
Answer:
Explanation:
The problem is they don't. One day you will take a history class that talks about Hiroshima or the Holocaust. They were both tragedies of a kind that is almost impossible to record with no bias.
But what would happen if you read the history from another point of view. Suppose, which I don't think has been done in any school in North America, you were to read about Hiroshima from the point of view of the Japanese. What have they said about it? What will they teach their children? What is the folklore about it from their point of view? Undoubtedly their best historians will record it without bias, but will be the same as what we read? I'm not entirely sure.
That does not answer your question, but I have grave doubts that it is possible. Personal bias always comes into everything. I will say this about your question: we must do our best to present the facts in an unbiased manner. That's important because we need to have a true picture of what happened. Many times it is because historians don't want humanity committing the same errors as the events they are trying to make sense of.
So far we have not dropped an atomic weapon on anyone else. But there have been holocausts after the European one. What have we learned? That six million is a number beyond our understanding, and we have not grasped the enormity of the crime, bias or no bias.
This question is easy, I learned this a few years ago when I was in Middle School.
Here are the correct answers:
- B. Stone pillars telling of focus on people's well-being
- C. Buddhism spreads
<h2>These are the correct answers, thank me later!</h2>
Answer: the answer is c :)
Explanation: i just took the test
Answer:
The most important facts of the economy were: the imbalances of countries such as the United States, Japan and Germany, which were manifested in the exchange, credit and securities markets, the acceleration in the integration of Europe.
Explanation:
These facts suggest that the economic policy of the late 1980s could focus more on the subsidiary and market economy, with better coordination and that it would be more favored in saving and thinking about the stability of the financial and banking system. The most important challenge should be to converge towards GDP or the level of inflation without resorting to monetary policy and without abuse in fiscal policy.
