Which was more effective at telling the story of jimmy valentine, the text or film version

English

2 answers:

raketka [301]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The text was more able to retell a truely story, firsty because the original was a mute movie and second specially because the time would never be enough to tel the story of a life with the details that only a written story making use of words and the alive language could to enrich the imaginary of the readers.

sesenic [268]3 years ago

3 0

The text because in a story things can be described in a much better context then a film. with a movie they leave out a lot of "unnessicary" details

You might be interested in

Read the passage from I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings:

kow [346]

In the autobiographical novel “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” by Maya Angelou (1969), the author has used the stylistic device called alliteration. Alliteration is used when a number of words, having the same first consonant sound, occur close together in a series. The purpose of using this stylistic device is to focus on word sounds to further develop a picture, emotion, or sound. A clear example of the use of alliteration and its purpose in this passage is the following phrase “If the morning sounds and smells were touched with the supernatural…” (the repetition of /s/ sound). Here, alliteration focuses on words related to the senses (sounds, smells, supernatural) to describe “the late afternoon”.