Yes, progress occurs when the people govern and the little clique that dominated the nation must disappear because they ruled to benefit themselves, not the country or its residents.
If people control a nation, good progress occurs in every sector, leading to the country's and its people's development.
This is further explained below.
<h3>Describe a development that was the product “of a widespread sense that the people should rule and that government by traditional elites had come to an end.”?</h3>
Generally, The reign of a small number of elites over a nation must come to an end in order for the nation to experience true progress. This is due to the fact that the small group of elites only governed for their own gain, and not for the good of the nation or its population.
In conclusion, If there is a rule of people in the nation, then good growth will occur in every sector, which will contribute to the development of both the people and the country.
Read more about development
brainly.com/question/28011228
#SPJ1
The answer would most probably be letter b. unpredictable
The early start of the 1920’s had brought the US to an era of prosperity due to the industrialization of many factories in the US. By 1929, there was a big shift in the economy. The stock market crashed and led to the economic recession in the US.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think the Candy Bomber reflects the story of the Berlin Airlift in that it shows the humanitarian side of the military, in this case, American Colonel Gail Halvorsen, who was a command pilot for the US Airforce that participated in the Berlin Airlift, after Soviet leader Joseph Stalin had ordered to close any land entries to West Berlin.
Colonel Halvorsen used to drop candy as a gift to German kids. So people started to call him "Candy Bomber."
The United States, France, and British Airforce sent airplanes full of food and supplies to West Berlin. This helped people survive for almost a year.
Polytheism is the belief in many gods.
Nationalism and Imperialism are two terms that should be understood in different senses. Nationalism is based on aggressiveness in its concept. On the other hand imperialism is constructive in its concept.
Imperialism is a kind of rule that aims at bringing equality of values, beliefs, and expertise among empires and kingdoms through domination and is autocratic in nature and also sometimes monolithic in its concept. Imperialism is a kind of western undertaking that employs expansionistic views and ideas in its ideals. Nationalism on the other hand paves the way for enmity among nations. A nationalist feels that his own country is better than any other country.
According to the great thinker George Orwell, nationalism is deeply rooted in emotions and rivalry. It makes one contemptuous of the virtues possessed by other nations. Nationalism makes one intolerant towards the progress made by other nations.
Nationalism makes one think that the people belonging to one’s own country should be considered one’s equal. Such thoughts are not present the ideals of imperialism. A nationalist does not mind about the deficiencies of his country but on the contrary takes into account only its virtues.
A nationalist strives for the domination of a nation and expresses his love for the country in an aggressive way. An imperialist though creates unequal economic relationship between states yet he maintains the unequal relationships based on domination. This is a subtle difference between the two terms.
Nationalism gives importance to unity of by way of cultural background and linguistic environment. The factors of cultural background and linguistic environment are not taken into account by the imperialist to a great extent.
