Because the internet make it so much easier for consumers to do research before making decision.
Through the internet, the consumers could know the credibility of a certain product by reading past experiences of other consumers that have used it before. Not only that, the consumers might know the side effects of the product which might be intentionally hidden by the producer.
Answer:
The answer is 5.47 percent
Explanation:
Firstly, we find coupon payment (PMT).
it can be gotten from the price (present value) of bond formula:
PV = PMT/(1+r)^1 + PMT/(1+r)^2 ....... PMT + FV/(1+r)^n
N = 10.5 years
1/Y = 6.2 percent
PV = $945
PMT = ?
FV = $1000
Using a Financial calculator to input all the variables above,
Annual PMT = $54.72
Semi annual will be $54.72/2= $27.36
Coupon rate is Annual PMT /par value
= $54.72/1000
0.0547 or 5.47 percent
The option that represents the rise in labor productivity will be C. GDP increased from 200 billion dollars to 400 billion dollars, while total labor hours increased from 50 million to 75 million.
Labor productivity simply means the workforce productivity. It's the real ouput per labor hours. It's the amount of goods that are produced for a given time period.
An increase in labor productivity will be the increase in the GDP from 200 billion dollars to 400 billion dollars, while total labor hours increased from 50 million to 75 million.
Learn more about GDP on:
brainly.com/question/1383956
Answer:
Utility
Explanation:
In economics satisfaction and pleasure is defined as a utility. When a person drinks water he/she gains utility that is a sense of satisfaction. The most important factor that increases or decreases the demand for a particular commodity is how much utility or satisfaction it provides to the end-user. Overall, the concept was first explained by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.
Answer:
Yes, Rawls could collect.
Explanation:
It is possible that Rawls collects damages due to negligence. This is due to the fact that the main cause of the accident was not substantiated by the Progressive Northern Insurance Company. The company claimed that the accident could have been caused by a series of events and the company was also not certain about the main cause of the accident.
