Answer:
B. $1,989.75
Explanation:
Cost of option (C) = $510.25
Option selling price (Po) = $85 per share
Share price when selling (Ps) = $60 per share
Number of shares (n) = 100 shares
Since the option allows you to sell shares that are valued at $60 for at $85 each, by selling 100 shares, your total earnings are:
To find the pre-tax net profit (P), subtract the amount paid for the options from your earnings:
The answer to this question is <span>The people who created and are traveling through the routes. The Hanseatic route was really famous to be passed by the people in Germany, while the Venetian trade route was really famous to be passed by the people in Italy (Especially Italian maritime republics such as Genoa and Venice)</span>
Answer:
100%
Explanation:
Stockholders of Dog's R Us Pet Supply expect a 12% rate of return on their stock. Management has consistently been generating a ROE of 15% over the last 5 years but now believes that ROE will be 12% for the next five years. Given this the firm's optimal dividend payout ratio is now 100%
Answer:
18.65%
Explanation:
Cost = $12,300
Total Payment = $420 × 36
= $15,120
Difference in the cost and payment = $15,120 - $12,300 = $2,820
Interest rate is the ratio of the interest to the original cost of the item.
The interest is the difference between the amount paid and the actual cost.
Interest rate = ($2,820/$15,120) × 100%
= 18.65%
Answer:
Right now marcantuone and robert gieson ought not be held at risk for what the drycleaner inhabitants did.Because there was no release of perilous substance during their ownership.The chlorinated dissolvable pollution issue right now the aftereffect of dry cleaning activity led preceding the condemnee's acquisition of the property.There was no proof of a release of unsafe substance during the time of condemnee's ownership.The sullying was not found until after the condemner had procured the title to the property in the judgement activity.
As indicated by the spill demonstration the obligation is vested on a condemner who bought debased property and didn't attempt any assessment or examination at the hour of procurement.
