Answer:
Mitigate his damages
Explanation:
By law, mitigation involves making effort to reduce losses. Now, an individual claiming damages or losses due to break in contract or a wrongful act by another individual has a duty under the law to mitigate those damages. That is to say, the plantiff is under a duty under the law to reduce the loss by taking advantage of any opportunity arising that may help.redice the losses or damages. However, in this case, the plantiff, who's the landlord Henry did not mitigate the loss by not attempting to or renting the accommodation out for the remaining six month. Thus, the damages would likely be reduced because he failed to mitigate his damages as he should have done as required under the law.
Answer:
The advertising spend would reduce income taxes by $2.8 million
Explanation:
The advertising expense since it is allowable expense from profits made in the year would reduce income taxes next year by $2.8 million ($8 million *35%)
This means that because of its tax deductibility,it would make a business sense to incur the advertising cost of $8 million coupled with the fact the it has the potential to increase sales revenue over and above the current level of $280 million
Answer:
False
Explanation:
You just split everything 50-50
Answer:
An increase in taxes.
Explanation:
A rise in the prices is indications that the inflation rate is high. Policymakers should intervene by introducing contractionary measures that will counter the rising inflation. Fiscal policy measures, such as increasing taxes, reduce inflationary pressures without the risk of causing a recession.
Increase taxes reduces the purchasing power of businesses and individuals, thereby reducing the aggregate demand. A reduction in aggregated demand lowers production levels, which results in low inflation but increases the unemployment rate.
Answer:
The selling sales associate received $2,700
Explanation:
The final number was 180 thousand dollars. Then the MLS chared 5% of the total sale. Thus, 9 thousand dollars is the commission. Now, the commission was divided again and the sales associate received 50% of the listing office's commission. So those 9000 are divided in 2 and we get 4500 which then are divided and the selling sales associate receives the 60% of that amount or 2700 dollars.
