1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivan
3 years ago
15

How did the Continental Army retaliate?

History
2 answers:
Ratling [72]3 years ago
8 0
The Continental Army was established by a resolution of the Continental Congress. The Continental Army under the command of George Washington was created to coordinate the military efforts of the 13 colonies in the rebellion against British rule.The soldiers had no formal military experience, no uniforms, no established commanders and there were limited firearms. The Continental Army were obvious underdogs. However, The Continental Army did have some advantages over the British Army: their soldiers knew the terrain and could make use of this knowledge using defensive tactics. Also they had great leaders.
lys-0071 [83]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

<em>The Continental Army</em> or <em>George Washington's Army,</em> due him being its Commander in Chief to fight independence from the British rule were more motivated due the possibility of freedom, and unlike the British side, they retaliated with no restraint, including genocidal warfare, which most times caused intimidation, plus they appealed to other nations such as France and Spain as allies against Britain.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Explain how this man, and others like him, "lost all on the stock market." *
siniylev [52]

Answer:

because If you’re depressed about all the money you’ve lost in the stock market, learn to profit from chaos

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What ways did the United States become involved in Latin America affairs?
gayaneshka [121]
Vital interest and the instruments of power
8 0
3 years ago
During World War I, the Russian army was​
Leno4ka [110]

Answer:

pretty sure it was large, whether or not it was ill prepared to fight is up for debate. It's been a few years since I revised this, but I'm pretty sure that during the Schleiffen plan the German army relied on the Russians being too slow to defend themselves, however they were quicker than expected? due to this and the sheer size of the army itself I would say d, large and well prepared to fight. They were large enough that even if they were awful in combat they would still be a force to be reckoned with, as they could afford to supply men after men without running out, unlike the German army. 

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The german forces in europe began had begun to retreat in the summer of 1944, but in december 1944 they launched an attack, know
zhuklara [117]
Louis's Answer: The Bulge

Take care and have a good one 
6 0
3 years ago
What did Abraham Lincoln do for a living?
Len [333]
He helped the slaves to get away from being slaves.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When was the last partial eclipse of the sun in the united states?
    15·2 answers
  • According to the video, what President visited Henry Ford?
    15·2 answers
  • Pacific island nations tend to have a lower GDP than other parts because of A) too many environmental problems B) overpopulation
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT true about John Jay?
    15·1 answer
  • What parts of his financial plan does Hamilton get?
    13·2 answers
  • How can the fiscal policies of a country influence individual finances?
    5·1 answer
  • Brainly ‍♀️?..............
    14·2 answers
  • Somebody please help !! ( history ) !!
    9·1 answer
  • Who led efforts to draw up the japanese constitution.
    13·1 answer
  • In 35 words or fewer, explain what this fact tells us about the past: the common era begins with the birth of Jesus of Nazareth.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!