<span>Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? It's a civil law because it's a misunderstanding between two civilians.
</span><span>Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? How do you know? I believe it might be a combination of statue and regulation law because there's some documentation and exchange item.
</span>Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? It is to protect the people's rights, not safety. " She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car." <span>The disagreement is over a vehicle which is just property.
</span>Do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? In other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? I think she does not have a valid argument. "<span> She signed ownership over to him on the title, which he also signed. She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car." </span><span>If she wants to sell her car, she should have done it the proper way, otherwise she should be prepared to meet the consequences.
</span>
First, they had to learn English. No one put up signs or notices in other languages for them.
<span>Then, they had to get work, because the government didn't give money to anyone. You had to earn it yourself! </span>
<span>No one cut you any breaks if you were a different nationality. The Italians and Irish were especially subject to cruelty. </span>
<span>Swedish and German immigrants: many of these made their way to Wisconsin and Minnesota. They established dairy farms, in particular, and also grew wheat. In this part of the country, there are hundreds of Lutheran churches that they founded, as most of these immigrants were, if not Lutheran, Protestants.
2. It is different we all know that there is still racism during 1800's and until now. Statue of Liberty is just a big structure nowadays.</span>
<h2>Answer:</h2>
•FLAT/TWO DIMENSIONAL
<h2>Explaination:</h2>
The only characteristic which was not in Renaissance.
mark brainliest please
In the United States constitution, granting pardons is an example of a presidential power that has no clear limitation.
FURTHER EXPLANATION
One of the least powers granted to the president by the constitution is the power to pardon. Though the constitution makes some limitation to the powers and the only limitations is that powers are limited to offences against the country. The constitution addressed it further that the power given to the president to pardon cannot in any way affect an impeachment process.
The power of a president to pardon does not affect the legal guilt of a person instead it only remove the legal effect of a conviction.
A person may be pardoned after committing an offence and pardon can also be granted after a complete sentence is served. Nevertheless, the president cannot issue a pardon when an offense has not been committed.
The power given to the president of the United States to pardon was obtained from the royal English prerogative of kings after the attack by Normans. During this era, the king granted pardon in return for military service or money, though the parliament tried to strip the king of this power, but it was not successful until 1701 when it passed the settlement ACT. The Settlement ACT removed the royal power to pardon in the case of impeachment.
LEARN MORE:
example of a presidential power brainly.com/question/1794184
KEYWORDS:
- constitution
- power to pardon
