Answer:
· Only with an individual or group where there is an established trusting relationship
· Only when it enhances the treatment or learning process for the patient, and when the example makes a
· For ego-enhancement, to get a laugh, or to make someone admire you
· When it is something that you would not want the other person sharing about themselves
· When it could jeopardize the future treatment or safety of the patient
Explanation:
So just answer the question, that is it?
Answer and Explanation:
The most informal level of language I use is with my friends in online messaging apps. This type of language is usually very fast and with lots of slang and abbreviations. As my friends are close to my age and we are at the same level of hierarchy, this type of language is common and even stimulated between us, as it allows a more relaxed communication to be established.
The most formal level of language I use is with my internship supervisor, where I use very respectful language and more elaborate words, without using slang, abbreviations or idiomatic expressions. In this language I use the most cultured form of language, since a respectful relationship needs to be established.
The similarity between these two types of communication is that they both seek to establish social relationships. At the more informal level, language seeks to establish a more comfortable and relaxed relationship. At the more formal level, language seeks to establish a more professional and respectful relationship. Changing the level of formality in each situation is easy to establish when you have clear objectives about communication and the results it can achieve.
I think it only contains 2 phonemes
raffic fatalities in alcohol-impaired-driving crashes decreased by 7.4 percent from 11,711 in 2008 to 10,839 in 2009. The alcohol-impaired-driving fatality rate per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT) decreased to 0.36 in 2009 from 0.39 in 2008. An average of one alcohol-impaired-driving fatality occurred every 48 minutes in 2009.
Of the 10,839 people who died in alcohol-impaired-driving crashes in 2009, 7,281 (67%) were drivers with a BAC of .08 or higher. The remaining fatalities consisted of 2,891 (27%) motor vehicle occupants and 667 (6%) nonoccupants.
In 2009, a total of 1,314 children age 14 and younger were killed in motor vehicle traffic crashes. Of those 1,314 fatalities, 181 (14%) occurred in alcohol-impaired driving crashes. Out of those 181 deaths, 92 (51%) were occupants of a vehicle with a driver who had a BAC level of .08 or higher, and another 27 children (15%) were pedestrians or pedalcyclists struck by drivers with a BAC of .08 or higher.
The rate of alcohol impairment among drivers involved in fatal crashes in 2009 was four times higher at night than during the day (37% versus 9%). In 2009, 16 percent of all drivers involved in fatal crashes during the week were alcohol-impaired, compared to 31 percent on weekends.
