The Chinese Room Argument was first published in a paper in 1980 by American philosopher John Searle (1932- ). It is a thought experiment in which <span>Searle imagines himself alone in a room following a computer program for responding to Chinese characters slipped under the door. </span><span>
Searle argues that the Chinese room thought experiment shows that n</span><span>o digital computer will ever be able to think.</span>
Answer: This type of territory is referred to as a secondary territory.
Explanation:
SECONDARY TERRITORY.
These are the places that we use individually or as a group but that we don't have ownership over or that we don't control but we use them every now and then for special gatherings.
Each individual or group own that territory for that particular period of time but they do acknowledge that others also have the right to temporarily use that space for example a church house , restaurant, classroom and community halls.
We use these territories on special occasions such as weddings, soccer practice , rehearsals and other group activity or individual activities .
Answer:
The statement that is most accurate of those listed is Option D. Regardless of which side they chose, Native Americans lost land during the war.
Explanation:
Before the American Revolution, the expansion of the 13 colonies westward was controlled to some extent by the British Crown. There were laws in place meant to protect Native American lands west of the Appalachian mountains after the British won the lands from the French and Indian war (also known as the Seven Years War, from 1754-1763). During the American Revolution, there were Native American groups that supported the British and others that supported the Patriots. However, after the war, the new United States government continued its expansion westward and the Native American groups definitively lost land.
Answer:
The answer is a double-blind study.
Explanation:
A double-blind study is a research method in which neither the participants or the researchers are aware about which group is receiving the treatment. This is done in order to avoid biases such as the placebo effect, as well as preventing accidental cues given by the researchers.
The greatest advantage of this approach is its high validity.
