Answer:
Minimize harm because the protester might be affected by the interview.
Seek truth because the protester made a statement about a major issue.
Explanation:
The SPJ Code of Ethics is a guide that encourages journalists to take responsibility for the information they provide. It is not a strict set of rules, but it's important either way because some basic principles need to be followed in sensitive cases, such as this one.
As the protester is a minor, she needs to be protected. That's why the harm should be minimized as much as it's possible. But, at the same time, there is a possibility that the mother is not telling the truth. It is understandable that she may not want her daughter to be exposed, but the truth matters. If the protester is aware of the fact her face may be on television and wants to be heard, it should be alright to air the interview. After all, she spoke about an important issue. That's why the reporter should seek the truth and then try making the right decision.
Thus, the correct options are the last two.
C is the correct answer because the author used “would be” to represent his/her opinion
Answer:g00gle come in clutch i be telling people but no body listen or search it on brainly
Explanation:
The answer is A, I believe
hope this helps, have a great day and good luck!
Answer:
C Establish a cultural comparison for her argument about napping.
Explanation:
The author has tried to mention the custom of European napping. It is a mid day pause from the routine works to feel the individual fresh every day. The person can have a short break from his work and enjoy the time doing things that make him feel fresh again. The author has made comparison from the other countries who do not follow such rituals.
