Framers had their blind spots. I won’t mention slavery for the moment, since that’s where everyone goes and since that blot has been amended out of the Constitution (and since many of the Framers, notably Ben Franklin and Alexander Hamilton, were anti-slavery).
One of the big blind spots, which seriously interfered with their thinking on many constitutional matters, is that they believed it would be possible to have national politics without political parties. This played a big role in the creation of the Electoral College system. The strange tale of how the electoral system came about puts some of its weird features into context. Once you get this context, it is at least understandable what the Framers thought they were doing.
Dictatorship, like Hitler was a dictator
By, seething a law and preforming protest
Answer: Internal; External
Explanation:
According to Rotter's expectancy theory, He explains that people into are classified into two categories which are internals and externals.
Internals are individuals who believe that the outcome of events that happen to them are as a result of their own effort and contributions.
Externals, on the other hand, attribute outcomes of events that happen to them to luck which were not controlled by them .
Studies have shown that internals are more likely to do better at school, than externals. Looking at the statement, Zack and Lavina each get an A on their English exams. Zack believes that he received an A because he is extremely intelligent, and so he is an <u>Internal</u><u> </u>while Lavina believes she received an A because she was lucky to have an easy exam shows Lavina is an __<u>_</u><u>_External</u> according to Rotter's expectancy theory.
