Answer:
The run on sentence here is, "Sprained ankles are common injuries for athletes, a sprain may not even need treatment."
Explanation:
A run-on sentence happens when two or more independent clauses are fused incorrectly. There are two types of run-on sentences. There are fused sentences and comma splices.
A fused sentence transpires when independent clauses work collectively with no signs of punctuation or correlating conjunctions to distribute them. A comma splice befalls when two or more independent clauses are linked exclusively by a comma.
When talking about, "Sprained ankles are common injuries for athletes, a sprain may not even need treatment." The part that is wrong here is the comma before "a." This is wrong because this is a massive voice missue.
The comma would mean to take a pause, which is a missue in human beings voice.
To correct this you would put a period for a full stop in that sentence and continue with the subject afterwords.
"Sprained ankles are common injuries for athletes. A sprain may not even need treatment.
You subsitute the comma with a period and make the lowercase an uppercase A.
Answer:
To show that everyone should be considered equal.
Explanation:
Hamilton is literally my favorite musical-
Here is the answer that would best complete the given statement above. <span>The point of view in Merwin's essay Unchopping a tree can be described as a procedural essay. In his essay, he instructs in a step by step way on how to build a tree back from being chopped. Hope this answers your question.</span>
To avoid plagiarism we should not Copy from other people
.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Turning in another person's work as your own, duplicating words or thoughts from another person without giving credit may prompt appropriated. On the off chance that there are five successive words indistinguishable from another person's composition, at that point you are blameworthy of literary theft.
The significant method to evade literary theft is with a summarization. A reword is commonly a similar length as the first content yet written in your own words, similar to a rundown.
So a summarization of a page would be about a page; an interpretation of a section would be generally a similar length as the first passage. Regardless of whether it was not deliberate, it is still copyright infringement and not worthy.
Answer:
B) would be the answer. (Still not 100% sure but hopefully this is correct AND it helps!)
Explanation:
A) The passage has NOTHING about persuading the readers to vote for Jack Snow. The passage just tells info about Jack Snow (and his opponent!)
C) would also not be correct (although it does seem correct!) since that wasn't necessarily the authors purpose. The whole passage (except the end) is about Jack Snow and Tom Oaks, their slogans, their background etc, and only at the end the authors asks the reader to vote. If the purpose of the author was to convince the reader to vote, the author would've mentioned it more in the passage.