The act of 1813 which states. The East India Company Act 1813, also known as the Charter Act of 1813, was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdomwhich renewed the charter issued to the British East India Company, and continued the Company's rule in India. However, the Company's commercial monopoly was ended, except for the tea trade and the trade with China. Reflecting the growth of British power in India,
1. The Act expressly asserted the Crown's sovereignty over British India.
2. It allotted Rs 100,000 to promote education in Indian masses and allowed them to open anywhere anytime.
3. This act permitted Christian missionaries to propagate English and preach their religion.
The power of the provincial governments and courts in India over European British subjects was also strengthened by the Act.[2]Financial provision was also made to encourage a revival in Indian literature and for the promotion of science.[3]
The Company's charter had previously been renewed by the Charter Act of 1793, and was next renewed by the Charter Act of 1833.
Answer:
North did not allow slavery, while south supported only one major political party.
Explanation:
the civil war was based on slavery
If you watched the latest supreme court nomination with Judge Brett Kavanaugh, you can see that it is quite a feat and that the nominee must not have any skeletons in his closet. In other words he/she must be as close to perfect as can be. But nobody is perfect, and the other party is going to dig up dirt.
But a good supreme court nominee is not a Republican or a Democrat, and they do not consider themselves as chosen by a specific president of a specific party, and their job is solely to uphold the Constitution as they fully believe the founding fathers meant for it to read when it was written, along with previous precedents as by lower courts, including their own past rulings. They should listen, and take precedence into consideration, and then judge based on purely non-partisan opinion.
I do not think that we have the right process to approve Supreme Court nominees, since Republican majority leader in the Senate Mitch McConnell used the nuclear option in order to push Donald Trump’s judges through with only a majority vote in the Senate instead of a 60 vote requirement, which would have at least required the votes of some Democrats. So if the Senate has 51 Republicans, they are going to approve every candidate Donald Trump nominates. The same goes with a Democratic president. But once the nuclear option has been used it can never be taken back. So from here on out through the rest of history, instead of a 60 vote count by the Senate to approve the SC nominee, the nuclear option forever changed the vote and so only a majority vote of 51 party leaders is needed. To me that is not right.
For example, Donald Trump will probably nominate 3 Supreme Court justices before his term ends, as he has already nominated two. And he is clearly stacking the Supreme Court to be very conservative and they are very likely to overturn laws that the Supreme Court itself set in the past… Such as Roe versus Wade.
There are many ways in which the government encourage the growth of big business after the Civil War, but in general, since slavery was no more, the government promoted the idea of business in the South in order to transform its economy.
The main goal behind President Kennedy's Peace Corps was the “Improvement of America's Image”. During the course of this program, President Kennedy gave the idea of forming a new Army. This was a volunteer program, made up of young civilians who would volunteer their skills to travel the underdeveloped nations to assist them in one or another way. The goal of the program, however, included the Promotion of World Peace and Friendship.