All categories

3 years ago

A 2D vector can have a component equal to zero even when its magnitude is nonzero.

Mathematics

1 answer:

lys-0071 [83]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

T F F F T F T

Step-by-step explanation:

A 2D vector can have a component equal to zero even when its magnitude is nonzero. TRUE.

it will be actually a 1d vector, but it's still a 2d vector too. this happens when the vector it's aligned to one of the axis.

The direction of a vector can be different in different coordinate systems. FALSE

The direction of a vector is independent of any coordinate system.

A 2D vector can have a magnitude equal to zero even when one of its components it nonzero. FALSE.

because the only way $\sqrt{x^{2} +y^{2} } =0$ is that both x and y are equal to zero

The magnitude of a vector can be different in different coordinate systems. FALSE.

The magnitude stays the same in every coordinate system

It is possible to multiply a vector by a scalar. TRUE.

it changes only it's magnitude.

It is possible to add a scalar to a vector. FALSE.

you can´t sum elements of diferent spaces. R, $R^{2}$ , etc

The components of a vector can be different in different coordinate systems.TRUE.

The components of a vector are just a way for identifying the vector, in a determinate coordinate system, the way i call those components will change as I change the name I call every point in the plane.

You might be interested in

Addition prop of equality

Eva8 [605]

1 multiplication prop
2simplifying
3 Addition prop
4 simplifying

4 0

3 years ago

Pls help!! need it fast.... I'm stuck

viktelen [127]

Answer:

So this is also going to stay the same, multiply first, divide, then you have your answer. Make sure if needed you need to round up your numbers.

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Jeff has a square piece of art paper he cuts across it from one corner to the opposite corner to make two pieces, what is the to

nasty-shy [4]

Lemme show you a diagram
a square and the 2 sides

when 2 sides come together, they make an angle

so see diagram 1 (before cut)
diagram 2 is after cut, you get 2 triangles
6 sides, 6 angles total

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the answer to 63+x+13=3x,x

Gnoma [55]

$63 + x + 13 = 3x \\ 63 + x + 13 - 3x = 0 \\ combine \: like \: terms \\ - 2x + 76 = 0 \\ - 2x = - 76 \\ \frac{ - 2x}{ - 2} = \frac{ - 76}{ - 2} \\ x = 38$

5 0

3 years ago

Please help. I don’t understand the problem.

Sauron [17]

Answer:

ASA

Step-by-step explanation:

ASA stands for Angle-Side-Angle which is the congruency theorem that states that if a triangle shares two congruent angles that have one line in between the two angles share a side length congruent to each other, then the two triangles are congruent.

Before you get very confused on the difference between AAS (Angle-Angle-Side) and ASA (Angle-Side-Angle), let explain why these two triangles are ASA.

We are given that both triangles share a similar side length at KL where they are connected. We are also given that angle ∠JKL is congruent to angle ∠MKL. We are also given that angle ∠MLK is congruent to angle ∠JLK.

The most important part after deciding all the relationships is given to us, it is deciding what kind of congruence theorem we will use. We are given the options:

SSS (Side-Side-Side)
SAS (Side-Angle-Side)
ASA (Angle-Side-Angle)
AAS (Angle-Angle-Side)
HL (Hypotenuse-Leg)

Because we are presented with two congruent angles and one congruent side, we know that this triangle congruency theorem is either ASA or AAS. To understand why these triangles are ASA, we have to look at where the two-given congruent sides are located. As we can see in the name and in our two triangles, the congruent side lengths are in between the two angles as it touches both angle ∠JKL and angle ∠JLK in triangle ΔJKL, while in on ΔMKL, the congruent side length is also found between angle ∠MLK and angle ∠MKL. So, these triangles share ASA because they share two congruent angles connected by one congruent line.

ORDER MATTERS WHEN YOU WRITE YOUR CONGRUENCY THEROMS

AAS is technically not the same as ASA and I will explain that in one moment.

An example of AAS is if instead being told that ∠JKL is congruent to angle ∠MKL, we are given that ∠KJL is congruent to angle ∠KML instead. now the congruent sides are not connected to angle ∠KJL or angle ∠KML. The side is no longer in-between the two congruent sides. The reason order matters here are because order matters between AAS and ASA because in another theorem, SAS, you will find out order matter because while SAS guaranties congruency SSA does not. Technically, though, while both AAS and ASA both guaranty congruency, they are labeled separately, the way the remaining congruency thermos are.

5 0

1 year ago