The monster is big scary and green
The sentence from the passage that best shows that the debate was a parliamentary debate is: The Taft team went second, making a strong counterclaim, but their argument didn't have as much supporting evidence.
A parliamentary debate is held in academic settings and it originated from the British Parliament. In a parliamentary debate their are two sides who have their own points and support them with evidence.
In the chosen option, we see that the Taft team had a counterclaim. Even though they were making an argument, they did not have a supporting evidence.
This shows that they were engaging in a parliamentary debate that they were not properly prepared for.
Learn more about parliamentary debates here:
brainly.com/question/1695492
Answer: C. Alvarez shows how her parents' fears about the dictatorship affected their thoughts and actions even when they lived in the United States.
The main idea in both paragraphs is the fact that the author's parents were afraid of the consequences of political activity even as they were living in the United States, under democratic values.
In the first passage, she exemplifies this by talking about their silence surrounding anything "political" and their fear of disobeying authority. In the second paragraph, she discussed how her parents were afraid of the consequences of attending political meetings. In this way, the author links the two paragraphs and develops the central idea across the texts.
In Thorin's argument, Thorin promise to give Bard one fourteenth share of the hoard in silver and gold. He was talking about to Smaug's treasure. So the agreement was the Thorin gives Bard 1/4 of the treasure. At the same time, he refused since he thinks that he owes nothing humans only because the gold belonged to the humans first.
I hope I've help!
Who wrote the article and when was the article published and how credible is it
