Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
The correct answer is B. He hated to fight against the British, but he had to fight against Tyranny.
Explanation
George Washington (1732-1799) was an American politician who became one of the most influential figures in the history of the United States for having led the liberation campaign against the British between 1775 and 1783. Later, he became the first president of the United States from 1789 to 1797. According to the previous extract, it can be interpreted that George Washington did not feel comfortable fighting against the British because he recognized in them individuals like him, with the right to life, equality, and freedom. However, he also considered that the thirteen colonies had the potential to be independent and come out of British rule and tyranny so he had to fight them despite not feeling comfortable with it. According to the above, the correct answer is B.
Your answer is D) Sumerians built ziggurats with temples on top to appease many gods.
