1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jok3333 [9.3K]
3 years ago
11

Please Help!!

Mathematics
1 answer:
balandron [24]3 years ago
4 0
1. 20 is the answer for it
You might be interested in
What is the slope of the line?
Alex
The slope is 1/2

It moves right 2 and goes up 1.
3 0
2 years ago
Solve for the variable using cross products. <br> 3/5 = x/6 <br> Solve for x as a decimal
Lynna [10]

Answer:

x = 3.6

Step-by-step explanation:

3/5 = x/6

multiply both sides by 6

18/5 = x

as a decimal

x = 3.6

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Statistics - Please Help!!!<br> The question is in the screenshot.
arsen [322]

Answer: See the table below (attached image)

  • SSb = 2345
  • SSt = 5639
  • DFb = 5
  • DFw = 54
  • MSb = 469

=============================================================

Explanation:

I'll start at the right side of the table and work my way toward the left side.

I recommend you have a one way ANOVA formula sheet handy. Such a formula sheet should be located somewhere in the ANOVA chapter of your stats textbook, or toward the appendix section. There are various free online resources to search out as well.

On that formula sheet you should find that

(MSb)/(MSw) = F

where MSb and MSw are the mean squares between and within respectively.

We can find the value of MSb like so

(MSb)/(MSw) = F

MSb = F*MSw

MSb = 7.682*61

MSb = 468.602

This rounds to 469, so we'll go with MSb = 469. The reason I'm rounding is that I've done a similar problem in the past, and the computer system wanted me to round to the nearest whole number. Also, note how every value of the table given to us consists of whole numbers. Of course, your teacher may want you to keep the decimal value instead. So I would ask for clarification if possible.

Since we're going with MSb = 469, this means 469 goes in the last box of row 1.

-----------------------------------------------

Now go back to your reference sheet to locate this formula

MSw = (SSw)/(DFw)

Rearrange this formula to get

DFw = (SSw)/(MSw)

Now plug in the values we have from the table to find,

DFw = (SSw)/(MSw)

DFw = (3294)/(61)

DFw = 54  which goes in the box found in the second row.

-----------------------------------------------

Now recall that

DFb + DFw = df

where DFb is the degrees of freedom between and df is the total degrees of freedom, which in this case is 59.

Using the table and the value we found earlier, we can see that,

DFb = df - DFw

DFb = 59 - 54

DFb = 5   this goes in the second box of row one (ie above the 54).

-----------------------------------------------

Also on your formula sheet, you should see something like

MSb = (SSb)/(DFb)

where each lowercase 'b' stands for "between", and the other abbreviations are what were discussed earlier.

That formula rearranges into

SSb = (DFb)*(MSb)

Then we can use the values we calculated earlier to find

SSb = (DFb)*(MSb)

SSb = (5)*(469)

SSb = 2345  this goes in the first box of row one.

----------------------------------------------

Lastly, computing the total sum of squares (SSt) will simply involve us adding the two SSb and SSw values to get

SSt = SSb + SSw

SSt = 2345 + 3294

SSt = 5639 this goes in the box of row three.

----------------------------------------------

To summarize, we have these values to fill into the table

  • SSb = 2345
  • SSt = 5639
  • DFb = 5
  • DFw = 54
  • MSb = 469

where we have these abbreviations

  • SS = sum of squares
  • MS = mean square
  • DF = degrees of freedom
  • b = between
  • w = within

Check out the diagram below for the filled in values.

To summarize the formulas used, we basically have the template of

MS = (SS)/(DF)

for both between and within. And we also have the formula F = (MSb)/(MSw). So effectively, the values are found through various division formulas or rearrangements of such. I'm referring to working along any given row. For any given column, we add up the values to get the totals, though that of course does not apply to MS or F.

Admittedly, ANOVA tables and concepts can be confusing because there are a lot of variables and steps going on. But once you get used to it, it's not too bad if you can see how the patterns are emerging (the division and additions I was referring to earlier).

4 0
2 years ago
3(x+3/4+5-x/4-x/6)=10​
viva [34]

3(x+3-4+5-x-4-x-6)=10

-3x/-3= -28/3

x= -28/3

5 0
2 years ago
Three years ago a school spent four hundred thirty-eight thousand, seven hundred sixty-nine dollars and seventy-nine cents build
alukav5142 [94]
Answer: $438,769.79
Please mark me Brainliest
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • John takes one step every second, and each step is 33 inches long. How many miles per hour is John walking, given that 5280 feet
    15·1 answer
  • The GCF of 6 and 8 is__
    12·2 answers
  • Least common multiple of 15,24 by using prime factorization
    12·1 answer
  • Uncle Drew scored 28 points in 5 5/6 minutes during a game of basketball.
    9·1 answer
  • Find the volume please
    5·1 answer
  • What is the coefficient of the last term in the binomial expansion of (x + 1)9?
    5·2 answers
  • Which expression is equivalent to x-(3x+5)+2(x-3) - 2x
    8·1 answer
  • Any late night peeps still awake?
    6·1 answer
  • There is a line that includes the point (0, 4) and has a slope of 9. What is its equation in
    13·1 answer
  • What is the sum of the first 6 terms of the sequence defined by an = 3n - 2?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!