1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vladimir1956 [14]
2 years ago
7

Do you believe very young children should be given access to smart phones and/or social media? Why or why not?

History
2 answers:
igor_vitrenko [27]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I believe that children between the ages of 7-10 should be given access to a smartphone. I feel this way because around those ages children are developing into responsible young children and they need something to show that they are responsible. They also need something to entertain themselves.

goldenfox [79]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Little kids should not be give any Social media or any access to a phone. Kids shouldn't have any access to a phone or social media until their age 12-13 because I think that it's right for kids to be given social media when they are mature enough to and they are smart enough to not make bad decisions.

Explanation:

It is known that kids do not become mature until ages 18-25

You might be interested in
What happened to Lincoln’s son Willie on February 20, 1862
V125BC [204]

Wille Lincoln passed away in his bedroom that day, February 20, 1862

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the cause of the English settlers winning the French and Indian war?
mezya [45]
The English gained land such as the Ohio river valley.
6 0
3 years ago
Spending money on education and training is investing in the __________________
Phantasy [73]
There exist various ways of investment into human resources. Businesses can invest in general human capital, which is an investment into specific or general training that enables acquisition of general knowledge usable in various companies. This results in higher future expected return of investment.
8 0
2 years ago
The treaty of versailles who took the blame & responsibility
levacccp [35]
The  treaty of versailles declared Germany guilty of aggression. 
Germany was forced to pay 33 billion dollars and many parts of it like Alsace lorraine, coal mine at Saar were given to France.

Moreover it had to supply huge amounts of coal to Belgium and Italy as well.
Its army,navy and ships were reduced.

In short, it had to take over the blame and responsibility of the World War1
3 0
3 years ago
50 points please answer ASAP
OLEGan [10]

Answer:

90

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What major change took place around the world after world war II
    10·1 answer
  • When comparing presidents of the 1800s to those of the 1900s and 2000s, moderm presidents are more involved in?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the Sunshine act?
    12·2 answers
  • Which caused the US Army to take over atomic research in the early 1940s? A) the first atomic bomb test B) a letter from Albert
    10·2 answers
  • Who was in charge of investigating claims of communist activity in the government, armed forces, universities, and other areas o
    12·1 answer
  • What does lincoln mean by calling the civil war a test of the nation's ability to"long endure?"
    11·2 answers
  • Sentences on whether the United States should have helped Germany recover from World War II.
    5·1 answer
  • The city of Atlanta formed mainly as a ____________.
    5·1 answer
  • From a geographical standpoint, why was it important that Germany capture France before battling with Britain?
    10·1 answer
  • imagine you were the sailor from today’s reading. Write about a day on the Egyptian ship or a day on the island. Use details fro
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!