That could definitely be argued! The WWI was fought in Europe, so many European countries were left in pieces at its end. So they were definitely in need of outside support. One may also look at it from another point of view. The US refused to join the League of Nations, which shows that the country was not necessarily as involved in world affairs as it could have been.
Suburbs. because there you'll find more people and jobs and the city will only be about 5-10 minutes away
Answer:
A description of what life would be like in the industrial revolution is that they would have been employed if that teen was boy, or would stay home being taught to handle house work until the 1850's - 1870's. Then young teens girls who grew in to smart ladies around 1970's would start flooding colleges and universities for majors like medicine, law, dental and business. You would also have t liv through a time where the was always the absence of brother or father. Also every thin was run by a man. If you father wasn't around it was your brother, if you didn't have one or if he wasn't old enough another man from in the family would speak in everyone's place. If you didn't have one at all the gov't has a say or you loose every thing.
Explanation:
Why bc they were old school and you had to be really lucky, rich, white or have a thoughtful man in the home or all of the above in order to be any thing other than a white man in America (US)and still be able to keep your things.
Hope this helps!
Mainly seafood. Back then, fish, crab, clam, and other seafood was much cheaper than now and provided a much healthier diet.
Answer:
a) To ensure freedom from control by elected officials
Explanation:
Constitutionally (Article III), federal judges are appointed for life. The Constitution gives federal judges employment security so they may resolve cases without public or political pressure. Even if they make unfavorable judgments, federal judges can only be impeached.
They are sheltered from the political process yet being young and inexperienced encourages judges to remain on the bench long after good reason would have retired them. According to Eastman and UT professor Stephen Vladeck, term restrictions might diminish independence and let money influence the system. If judges were obliged to retire at 60, some industry or interest may have employed them later.
