All categories

3 years ago

3. 3 hours worked for $12; 9 hours worked for $36

Mathematics

2 answers:

nydimaria [60]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

What do we have to solve for this?

Y_Kistochka [10]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

I don't really understand if this is the question but if you're looking for amount of money per hour its 4$.

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

What is the value of x in the equation 5 x + 3 = 4 x ?

Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:

x = -3

Step-by-step explanation:

5 x + 3 = 4 x

Solve for x

5x - 4x + 3 = 0

x + 3 = 0

x = -3

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A national grocery store chain wants to test the difference in the average weight of turkeys sold in Detroit and the average wei

Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

Calculated value t = 1.3622 < 2.081 at 0.05 level of significance with 42 degrees of freedom

The null hypothesis is accepted .

Assume the population variances are approximately the same

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation:-

Given data a random sample of 20 turkeys sold at the chain's stores in Detroit yielded a sample mean of 17.53 pounds, with a sample standard deviation of 3.2 pounds

The first sample size 'n₁'= 20

mean of the first sample 'x₁⁻'= 17.53 pounds

standard deviation of first sample S₁ = 3.2 pounds

Given data a random sample of 24 turkeys sold at the chain's stores in Charlotte yielded a sample mean of 14.89 pounds, with a sample standard deviation of 2.7 pounds

The second sample size n₂ = 24

mean of the second sample "x₂⁻"= 14.89 pounds

standard deviation of second sample S₂ = 2.7 pounds

Null hypothesis:-H₀: The Population Variance are approximately same

Alternatively hypothesis: H₁:The Population Variance are approximately same

Level of significance ∝ =0.05

Degrees of freedom ν = n₁ +n₂ -2 =20+24-2 = 42

Test statistic :-

$t = \frac{x^{-} _{1} - x_{2} }{\sqrt{S^2(\frac{1}{n_{1} } }+\frac{1}{n_{2} } }$

where $S^{2} = \frac{n_{1} S_{1} ^{2}+n_{2}S_{2} ^{2} }{n_{1} +n_{2} -2}$

$S^{2} = \frac{20X(3.2)^2+24X(2.7)^2}{20+24-2}$

substitute values and we get S² = 40.988

$t= \frac{17.53-14.89 }{\sqrt{40.988(\frac{1}{20} }+\frac{1}{24} )}$

t = 1.3622

Calculated value t = 1.3622

Tabulated value 't' = 2.081

Calculated value t = 1.3622 < 2.081 at 0.05 level of significance with 42 degrees of freedom

Conclusion:-

The null hypothesis is accepted

Assume the population variances are approximately the same.

6 0

2 years ago

If the sum of five consecutive odd integers is 95, what is the smallest of the five integers?

xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

15+ 17+ 19+ 21+23

Step-by-step explanation:

consecutive odd integers, like 1, 3, 5, 7

consecutive even integers, like 2, 4, 6, 8

an integer is a whole number

4 0

2 years ago

2. The National Safety Council routinely analyzes the benefit of seat belt use on driver safety. Their data showed that among 28

JulijaS [17]

Answer:

We conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that among 2823 drivers not wearing seat belts, 31 died as a result of injuries, and among 7765 drivers wearing seat belts 16 were killed.

Let $p_1$ = proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts.

$p_2$ = proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts.

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1=p_2$ {means that there is no difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1\neq p_2$ {means that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z test for proportions;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts = $\frac{31}{2823}$ = 0.011

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts = $\frac{16}{7765}$ = 0.002

$n_1$ = sample of drivers not wearing seat belts = 2823

$n_2$ = sample of drivers wearing seat belts = 7765

So, the test statistics = $\frac{(0.011-0.002)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.011(1-0.011)}{2823}+\frac{0.002(1-0.002)}{7765} } }$

= 4.438

The value of z test statistics is 4.438.

Now, at 5% significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistic doesn't lie within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Also, Margin of error (E) = $1.96 \times \sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} }$

= $1.96 \times \sqrt{\frac{0.011(1-0.011)}{2823}+\frac{0.002(1-0.002)}{7765} }$

= 0.00397

5 0

3 years ago

How much taller is a meter stick than 65 cm will mark as brainiest

Lisa [10]

Answer:

it's 13 meters taller

Step-by-step explanation:

both meters are not the same which means it can't be another number

7 0

3 years ago