Answer:
Because it was a necesity
Explanation:
Once free, the Romans established a republic, a government in which citizens elected representatives to rule on the behalf. A republic is quite different from a democracy, in which every citizen is exected to play an active role in governing. So Roman people
Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that these two philosophies were completely at odds with one another, since the Enlightenment thinkers were strongly against absolute monarchies, while Filmer was supportive of them.
</span>
“Filmer argued for a strong monarchy, whereas Enlightenment philosophers claimed that government was not necessary because natural law would allow society to advance” is true about the relationship between Enlightenment philosophers and the philosophy of Robert Filmer.
Sir Robert Filmer was an English political theorist who defended the divine right of kings.
<h3>I think it's helpful for you ✌️❤️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️</h3>
Thanks✔️✔️
Answer: the Louisiana purchase i believe
Explanation: google lol
