Answer:
d
Explanation:
the answer is going to be d
Answer: the defendant used the trade secret without the plaintiff's permission.
Explanation: In other to stop a competitor from using a trade secret, the plaintiff must prove that a trade secret actually existed, that the defendant acquired the trade secret unlawfully and the defendant used the trade secret without the plaintiff's permission. In other words, you must be able to prove that a trade secret actually exist and your competitor unlawfully acquired it for his or her own interest.
Answer:
The answer is A. Not Human Subjects.
Explanation:
In this case, the research that the master's degree candidate has designed can be classified as a not human subjects research because, as it states in the question, she will not collect identifiers. This means that she will not be able to identify which data belongs to which convenience store owner, neither will she have data regarding the indentiy of the convience stre owners. Therefore, according to IRB committee, it is a not human subjects research.
Answer:
I think it’s consumer goods
Explanation:
