1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
exis [7]
3 years ago
12

How did the French Revolution& its legacy impact the German people?

History
1 answer:
artcher [175]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

For two centuries the varied interpretations that successive generations of historians have not ceased to contribute, constitute as many remodels of the event. The French Revolution has two opposite faces: on the one hand, the luminous face of 1789, a symbol of freedom, of equality and fraternity, of democracy and human rights, of triumph and of reason over obscurantism; on the other side, the face of terror applied in the name of the defense of revolutionary achievements in 1793.

The French Revolution had a strong influence on the German states, given the importance of the dissemination of Illustration in them. The German bourgeoisie was very aware of the development of events in France, as well as the privileged estates and the different Crowns for different reasons. Let us not forget, finally, the Napoleonic occupation over a large part of the German states. The main contemporary German philosophers of the Revolution were interested in it, but most of them were more concerned with philosophical, political and moral aspects than with the historical analysis of the causes, facts and consequences. They were, with nuances, defenders of the Revolution.

Enmanuel Kant (1724-1804) was a strong supporter of the Revolution because the establishment of the Republic meant achieving the most perfect and rational form of government, but rejected the violence and execution of Louis XVI.

Fichte (1762-1814) was also in favor of the establishment of the Republic but did defend the use of revolutionary violence because it was the only means to bring down the absolute monarchy. He even criticized the authors opposed to the Revolution because this was a stage on the road to freedom. But Fichte moved away with the time of the Revolution because he considered that he had not achieved his original liberal goals.

George W. F. Hegel (1770-1831) was also a fervent supporter of the Revolution because he was the one who had introduced Reason into politics and meant the victory of general interests over individuals. But he rejected the violent character he adopted in times of Terror.

Marx explains, with very concrete strokes for Germany, what he considers are the results and experiences of the French Revolution in bourgeois consciousness and practice. The unleashing of a process that aspires to develop a bourgeois revolution. That is to say, the essential claims that were claimed of the Ancien Regime staged social forces whose specific interests went beyond the original claims, and continually threatened the overflow of those borders, threatening, then, the stability and rules of the social order . That is, calling into question not the political order but that of society in general.

You might be interested in
Help!! Please and thank you
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

Maybe B.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
This Japanese war crime resulted in the deaths of over 11,000 American prisoners as part of the Battle of the Philippines in 194
klio [65]

going to go with Bataan Death March hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was the African-American who called the war with Mexico disgraceful and cruel? Why?
Vladimir79 [104]
Fredrick Douglas was the African American who said the Mexican War was "disgraceful" because he thought if America would annex Mexico then slavery would be carried over into the new territory.
3 0
3 years ago
How would the world be different if the Columbian Exchange never happened?
miss Akunina [59]

When Europeans first touched the shores of the Americas, Old World crops such as wheat, barley, rice, and turnips had not traveled west across the Atlantic, and New World crops such as maize, white potatoes, sweet potatoes, and manioc had not traveled east to Europe. In the Americas, there were no horses, cattle, sheep, or goats, all animals of Old World origin. Except for the llama, alpaca, dog, a few fowl, and guinea pig, the New World had no equivalents to the domesticated animals associated with the Old World, nor did it have the pathogens associated with the Old World’s dense populations of humans and such associated creatures as chickens, cattle, black rats, and Aedes egypti mosquitoes. Among these germs were those that carried smallpox, measles, chickenpox, influenza, malaria, and yellow fever.

The Columbian exchange of crops affected both the Old World and the New. Amerindian crops that have crossed oceans—for example, maize to China and the white potato to Ireland—have been stimulants to population growth in the Old World. The latter’s crops and livestock have had much the same effect in the Americas—for example, wheat in Kansas and the Pampa, and beef cattle in Texas and Brazil. The full story of the exchange is many volumes long, so for the sake of brevity and clarity let us focus on a specific region, the eastern third of the United States of America.

As might be expected, the Europeans who settled on the east coast of the United States cultivated crops like wheat and apples, which they had brought with them. European weeds, which the colonists did not cultivate and, in fact, preferred to uproot, also fared well in the New World. John Josselyn, an Englishman and amateur naturalist who visited New England twice in the seventeenth century, left us a list, “Of Such Plants as Have Sprung Up since the English Planted and Kept Cattle in New England,” which included couch grass, dandelion, shepherd’s purse, groundsel, sow thistle, and chickweeds. One of these, a plantain (Plantago major), was named “Englishman’s Foot” by the Amerindians of New England and Virginia who believed that it would grow only where the English “have trodden, and was never known before the English came into this country.” Thus, as they intentionally sowed Old World crop seeds, the European settlers were unintentionally contaminating American fields with weed seed. More importantly, they were stripping and burning forests, exposing the native minor flora to direct sunlight and to the hooves and teeth of Old World livestock. The native flora could not tolerate the stress. The imported weeds could, because they had lived with large numbers of grazing animals for thousands of years.

Cattle and horses were brought ashore in the early 1600s and found hospitable climate and terrain in North America. Horses arrived in Virginia as early as 1620 and in Massachusetts in 1629. Many wandered free with little more evidence of their connection to humanity than collars with a hook at the bottom to catch on fences as they tried to leap over them to get at crops. Fences were not for keeping livestock in, but for keeping livestock out.


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Aztec civilation was based on the belief that all persons in a society are equal
madam [21]
It's very interesting to wonder what life would have been like in a normal Aztec society family. There are many things we do know, although the record is frustratingly sparse. Record keepers were more interested in other aspects of society, and family life was considered the sphere of women. Still, there are many things we do know. Like other aspects of Aztec culture, life in an Aztec society family was permeated by religious beliefs, right from the start. Each decision was ruled by the laws of religion, and often tied to the sacred days in the Aztec calendar. The life of a new family began at marriage, typically in the early 20s for a man and mid- teens for the woman. Marriages were arranged by the relatives (though the children may have had input). The parents would have to talk to the religious leaders, and discuss the signs under which both of the children had been born. The wedding day, of course, was chosen for similar religious reasons. Men and women All this was full of ceremony and form. In Aztec society family a husband may have had more than one wife - but it would be his primary wife that would go through all the ceremony. The man may have many secondary wives, who would also be officially recognized. The children of the principal wife would be the inheritors - or, in the case of a ruler, only a child from the principal wife would be a successor. Still, the husband was supposed to treat all wives equally in daily life. As you may imagine, one family could grow very large. As a result, most of the husbands with numerous wives and children were the wealthy ones, with the poor more likely to have one wife. In one sense, society was dominated by the men. The man was considered the head of the home. However, women had a great deal of power as well. They may have had more power in earlier times, with men taking more power toward the end of the Aztec era. Women often were able to run business out of their homes, and had a lot of influence in the family and the raising of children. The older widows were much respected, and people listened to their advice. Adultery was a crime - death was the punishment. Divorce was allowed on certain grounds, presented by the man or woman, property was divided equally and both sides were free.
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • redkooladeuke are you there its hard to talk to you through comments somethings wrong with brainly need your help
    10·2 answers
  • What arrangement did President Madison make with France to stop the seizing ships?
    14·1 answer
  • Why is a dead tree considered a biotic factor if it is dead
    5·1 answer
  • What does the bill give the president the right to do
    8·1 answer
  • The ideas of the social gospel movement led directly to
    12·2 answers
  • Why did early humans paint on cave walls?
    6·1 answer
  • Where did the Separatists take their families in 1608?
    6·2 answers
  • О
    9·1 answer
  • Why was spain nervous about american exploration of the louisiana Purchase?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following were effects of World War 1?SELECT THREE CORRECT ANSWERS
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!