1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Harman [31]
3 years ago
11

Out of the three countries Germany, Japan and United States which approach to the Great Depression do you think was the most eff

ective? Why?
-And these countries were approaches
History
1 answer:
Georgia [21]3 years ago
8 0
United states obviously,  because Japan wanted just to wait it out and hope that over time thinds fall into place and Germany they tried to hard to hard with there communistic strategy to increrase income and agriculture that they almost destroyed there people in the process
You might be interested in
James Madison, a delegate from Virginia at the 1787 Constitutional Convention, recognized that one of the greatest flaws in the
dexar [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Were either of these plans chosen by the delegation or was there a compromise to appease both sides?

No, these plans were not chosen at the Constitutional Convention of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1787. James Madison, a delegate from Virginia at the 1787 Constitutional Convention, recognized that one of the greatest flaws in the Articles of Confederation was its lack of a strong centralized government. In response to this flaw, Madison developed the “Virginia Plan.” However, no all the delegates agreed. That is when the Virginia Plan was countered by the New Jersey delegation, proposing the “New Jersey Plan.” The delegates had many discussions and debates to agree on the new form of government for the United States. Federalists supported a strong central government. Antifederalists supported a simpler government that promoted civil rights and liberties. That is when James Madison drafted the Bill of Rights, which is the first ten amendments to the US Constitution.

6 0
3 years ago
If president and vice president are impeached who becomes president
stellarik [79]
No one.  Impeachment does not mean kicked out of office.  It means that they were brought to trial.  If they were to be kicked out of office, though, the Speaker of the House would then become President.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Locke, what would be considered personal property?
aalyn [17]
I think that the answer to your question is either A or C but I'm going towards A
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explore and Discuss
melomori [17]

Answer:

Considering these questions:

1. What if Napoleon had never been born? (In what ways would history have been different? Do you think someone else would have done what Napoleon did? Why?)

<em />

<em>a. If Napoleon was never born, someone else would have been born to undertake his roles but not in exact ways because nature abhors vacuum.</em>

<em>b. History would have been different because no two persons are the same and are created to perform exactly the same roles in nature. They might undertake similar ventures but not exactly the same at the given time.</em>

<em> c. Yes someone else would have done what Napoleon did but in his own way. As earlier said no two persons are the same with the same mission. </em>

2. The French Revolution began as a struggle for the rights of the people against a single ruler with all the power. It ended by giving all power to another single ruler. Why do you think that happened?  

Answer: It happened because the Public cannot be King, it is only a person that shall be given the people's mandate to lead the others. The only thing the people abhor or do not tolerate is high-handedness of a ruler not a leader. No leader is an absolute, that was why we should not allow too much power to be concentrated in an individual because of abuse. L<em>ord Acton said " Power corrupts but absolute Power corrupts absolutely."</em>

8 0
3 years ago
Why was Indiana named Indiana
bija089 [108]
Answer: the name means “Indian land” or “land of the Indians”. This name was given to the land by white settlers for the Indians that lived there when the settlers arrived.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some political and social consequences of child labor?
    11·1 answer
  • Discuss the argument of those in favor of and against Hamilton's plan to improve the economy
    14·1 answer
  • What also happened to the city of berlin?
    11·1 answer
  • HELP
    12·1 answer
  • Which form of government will yours be modeled after?
    15·1 answer
  • What is true about Henry Hudson
    9·1 answer
  • Mr. Kraler. That’s the man. A couple of weeks ago, when I was in the storeroom, he closed the door and asked me . . . how’s Mr.
    7·2 answers
  • I need help with this
    7·1 answer
  • How did the assembly line improve productivity?
    12·1 answer
  • What were john adams strengths and weaknesses as a president
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!