Answer:
I Dont know
Explanation:
sorrrrrrry I will try next time
Answer:
The answer is that the net income under absorption costing would be higher than the net income under variable costing.
Explanation:
Absorption costing and variable costing are terms used in accounting contexts. Absorption costing, also known as full costing, incurs overhead costs when the product is sold; not before it. Variable costing, also referred to as direct costing, would include overhead costs during the period the costs occurred. In this condition, net income would be higher using absorption since overhead costs would not be included until the product is sold.
Answer:
correct answer is c. You both have the same amount of money
Explanation:
given data
invest = $1000
pay compound interest = 10%
pay simple interest = 10%
time = 1 year
solution
we get here difference in the total amount that is your friend money - your money .................1
so difference in the total amount = invest × 
- [ invest + ( invest × rate × time) ] ......................2
put here value
difference in the total amount = $1000 × 
- [$1000 + ( 1000 × 10% × 1) ]
difference in the total amount = 0
so correct answer is c. You both have the same amount of money
I am pretty sure it's to decide if the applicant is creditworthy. ( Makes most sense. Did research too.) :)
The appropriate response is staff organization. It is a kind of participation gathering in which an expert staff directs the vast majority of the gathering's exercises. In this sort of association, the practical authorities are added to the line, accordingly giving the line the upsides of masters. The staff is fundamentally counseling in nature and normally does not have any summon expert over line administrators.
