A. the rules of ssyntax have been broken.
It would have made more sense if it was... His lawyer suddenly interrupted my thoughts by busting out questions.
one con is that people who have a strong love and desire for guns will be angered and enraged because people will be creating laws or try to limit our use of guns. I know many people myself that love to use guns for sport or for the aesthetical value, and they are upset because people want to take that away from them. On some level I can agree that we need to control guns because of the outbreak of killings, and a family member of mine was a part of one of the recent shootings and thankfully, she is okay, but I too was angered by this. But I must keep in mind that not all people use guns to kill, because some just love the sport of it, but some do use it to kill. I think we should accept basic small guns like a handgun for sport, but if anyone ever asked for a bigger gun should be questioned because what person needs a gun so big? There SHOULD be a limit and I think only police should have big guns.
Answer:
if you not would mind can you explain it i connot understand
You should map out what you are going to write about in your body paragraphs (pre-writing, outline, four-square). What are the main points in each paragraph that could help you to form the statement? Once you have that, it should make writing the thesis statement a bit easier. If this is just a general overview, you could write something like, "Tchaikovsky's composition was shaped by many events that occurred early in life, during his adult life, and long after he passed away." Again, it would largely depend on what you want your reader to know about the paragraphs they are about to read.
Answer:
1.They fight
2.He study hard all day
3.Somebody smoke in the room
4.She lie in the sun too long
5.They play football
6.She dream
