1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Komok [63]
3 years ago
10

Conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence. TRUE or FALSE.

English
1 answer:
Dmitry [639]3 years ago
5 0
I believe the answer to this is "true." Really, all conclusions on all events are subjective. But considering history, conclusions on events are especially prone to subjectivity. Consider who writes the history books. If one country wins a war against another country, they will write about themselves as the noble party and portray the enemy as villainous. However, this may not be the real case. This occurs much more than we think, and we must research different events to make sure we are not blindly buying into what people say. Hope this helps.
You might be interested in
In the United States, freedom of speech is protected by the first Amendment to the Constitution. There have always been limits t
7nadin3 [17]

Freedom of speech allows people to express themselves, however, there are some limitations and the thing missing is the use of obscenities which is not protected.

<h3>What is Freedom of Speech?</h3>

This refers to the privileges and rights that a person has to say what he wants, without being censored or restricted.

Hence, we can see that your question is a bit confusing because it does not specify what it wants to be found as it asks a general question, hence a general overview is given to you.

Read more about freedom of speech here:

brainly.com/question/6336973

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Explain the significance of Article V of the Constitution, and how it remains important to this day.
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Article Five of the United States Constitution describes the process whereby the Constitution, the nation's frame of government, may be altered. Altering the Constitution consists of proposing an amendment or amendments and subsequent ratification. Amendments may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a convention of states called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.To become part of the Constitution, an amendment must be ratified by either—as determined by Congress—the legislatures of three-fourths of the states or State ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states.[2] The vote of each state (to either ratify or reject a proposed amendment) carries equal weight, regardless of a state’s population or length of time in the Union.

Additionally, Article V temporarily shielded certain clauses in Article I from being amended. The first clause in Section 9, which prevented Congress from passing any law that would restrict the importation of slaves prior to 1808, and the fourth clause in that same section, a declaration that direct taxes must be apportioned according to state populations, were explicitly shielded from Constitutional amendment prior to 1808. It also shields the first clause of Article I, Section 3, which provides for equal representation of the states in the United States Senate, from being amended, though not absolutely.


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Comrades," he said, "I trust that every animal here appreciates the sacrifice that Comrade Napoleon has made in taking this extr
s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

d moonshine

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me with this!!!!!
natima [27]
Yes
yes
no
yes
no
no
no
no
no
yes
8 0
3 years ago
Need help badly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
trasher [3.6K]
The authors purpose for writing this was to discuss of the different Apollo programs, the type of missions they had and what they did.

The author emphasizes on what the Apollo missions were about and how long they were. The author emphasized on these details to show that the moon landing came in steps and didn’t just happen on the first day.

The methods the author used was dates and they helped by showing us how long the missions took.

The authors point of view is in third person, this point of view affects the meaning of the text by showing that the author did not have first hand experience about the Apollo missions. This makes the text more informative as for the author to know these exact details they would need to do extension research.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select all the correct answers.
    12·1 answer
  • Based on the map, which city will Marco Polo describe after Kalhat if he continues northwest across the Arabian Sea? Hormuz Dhof
    10·2 answers
  • When driving in fog or snow,_______
    13·2 answers
  • Please help and please don't be wrong.
    7·1 answer
  • What is 248times 3 i dont know it?
    15·1 answer
  • Is the phrase "the team decided" a noun phrase? please answer
    6·1 answer
  • Cut down on deal with hold on take up count on put up with turn down come down with bring out check up on 1. This singer will __
    7·1 answer
  • Describe TWO ways in which the above law protects citizens against human
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with my ela assignments I’ll pay u 20$ if it’s right I need a good grade
    14·1 answer
  • A fearful experience you encountered <br>​
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!