1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lora16 [44]
3 years ago
10

Reaction to the japanses attack on the us gunboat panay in china in 1937 revealed that

History
1 answer:
Minchanka [31]3 years ago
7 0
Japan's sinking of a US gunboat during its assault on nanking heightened tensions between the two countries four years before the attack on Pearl Harbor. on the morning of Dec 12.1937, the US gunboat PANAY was anchored in the middle of the Yangtze River 27 miles upriver from nanking.
You might be interested in
In the later phases of the Civil War, General __________, running for president against Lincoln, declared that he would not make
julia-pushkina [17]
The correct answer is George B. McClellan - the correct answer is B.

He lost to Lincoln very dramatically: Lincoln got over 70% of the votes.

McClellan saw slavery as in agreement with the Constitution - and later agreed that slavery needs to be abolished , but he would have favoured a gradual abolition.
4 0
3 years ago
*PLEASE ANSWER!!!*
Leno4ka [110]
B all the above are examples of folk art
5 0
3 years ago
What is war communism and who came up with the idea?<br>ASAP PLEASE HELP!!!!​
nexus9112 [7]

War Communism was the name given to the economic system that existed in Russia from 1918 to 1921. War Communism was introduced by Lenin to combat the economic problems brought on by the civil war in Russia.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
Question 1(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
Viefleur [7K]

The Compromise of 1850 reflected in the map as It ensured that the number of free and slave states was equal.

Option: C.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Reynolds W.C. along with Jones J.C. sketched a U.S. map to display the area of the slave and free states. That map also included the territory which was open to freedom or slavery after repealing the Missouri Compromise.

Missouri Compromise was signed to retain a balance among the number of free states and slave states in the Union. Thus it admitted Missouri to join as the slave state, meantime Maine joined as the free state. Hence by preserving the equivalence between numbers of slave and free states.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Indian Act of 1924 gave American Indians the right of U.S. citizenship.
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement about the electoral college
    9·1 answer
  • Who were the people that were taxed without consent in England?
    5·1 answer
  • Who had his head chopped of in 1649
    8·2 answers
  • Before becoming vice president, lyndon<br> b. johnson was the senate majority leader.
    10·1 answer
  • 15:47:39
    5·1 answer
  • Ultimately, what led the way for allied forces to attack Japan?
    13·1 answer
  • What actions between Charles I and Parliament resulted in an English Civil war?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the big 3 differ in what they wanted in a peace agreement to end World War 1?
    11·1 answer
  • As a result of the "corrupt bargain" of 1824, Andrew Jackson
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!