Hi. You forgot to say that this question is about "Jimmy Carter’s Nobel Lecture". In addition, you forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
A. To resolve violence and injustice throughout the world, nations needs to follow the terms put in place by international organizations who promote peace. B. Modern technology has allowed war to reach new heights of cruelty that can no longer be accepted. C. War is an unfortunate byproduct of human nature that society will never be able to be completely rid of. D. The only way that the United States can achieve peace is by avoiding involvement in other warring countries’ affairs. E. The growing power of the United States comes with a responsibility to maintain international peace and punish those who disrupt this peace. F. Because of its power and values, the United States has a responsibility to contribute to securing international peace, rather than engaging in war.
Answer:
A. To resolve violence and injustice throughout the world, nations needs to follow the terms put in place by international organizations who promote peace.
C. War is an unfortunate byproduct of human nature that society will never be able to be completely rid of.
Explanation:
Jimmy Carter was a pacifist and so it could not stop being his speech, when he went to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. In his speech he highlighted the importance of maintaining peace between countries, avoiding wars and conflicts that only cause destruction, pain and death.
In this text, he highlights the fact that in order to really promote peace in their territories, it is necessary that actions listen to and adopt the guidelines of organizations that are designed to promote peace, thus reducing violence and injustices in their territory.
It also reinforces the fact that war, in spite of only promoting sadness, is often a necessary evil. With this, he reinforces that war is an unfortunate by-product of human nature, which society will never be able to get rid of completely.
The two sentences in his response that an interviewer would consider appropriate are:
- My skill in persuading people would be a great asset in this job.
- Also, I’m good at making presentations, which is sure to help your marketing team.
<h3>Who is called interviewer?</h3>
This is known to be the person who is known to often functions as the person who asks the questions in an interview so that they can be able to see or find out if a person is suitable for a given job or course.
Hence, The two sentences in his response that an interviewer would consider appropriate are:
- My skill in persuading people would be a great asset in this job.
- Also, I’m good at making presentations, which is sure to help your marketing team.
Learn more about interviewer from
brainly.com/question/25609130
#SPJ1
Answer:
Congresswoman Mink uses a mix of pathos, ethos, and logos in her speech regarding “The Language of Government Act of 1995.” Mink uses pathos to appeal to the emotions and values of her audience, such as the sense of belonging and identity. She uses ethos to provide her credibility as a member of Congress who seeks to represent her constituents for whom English is a second language. Mink uses logos to provide facts, statistics, and evidence about English speakers in support of her argument.
A device that Mink relies on heavily is that of using rhetorical questions to strengthen her argument by emphasizing a point. The questions invite the audience to consider the issue at hand and allow Mink to offer her own solutions.
Explanation:
PLATO answer
Answer:
well for me I think it's
Explanation:
ethics because I every profession has an ethic
Answer:
you didn't describe the "following" so we can't answer
Explanation:
^
