What is the GCF of 150 and 275?

Write and solve the sentence as an inequality. A number minus 3 is less than -5.

Lorico [155]

Answer:

x - 3 < -5 is the inequality x < -2 is the solution

Step-by-step explanation:

x - 3 < -5

add 3

x < -2

5 0

3 years ago

Explain which event is more likely: rolling two dice and getting a total of 11, or, tossing a coin and getting three Heads in a

amm1812

Answer:

The gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy or the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the erroneous belief that if a particular event occurs more frequently than normal during the past it is less likely to happen in the future (or vice versa), when it has otherwise been established that the probability of such events does not depend on what has happened in the past. Such events, having the quality of historical independence, are referred to as statistically independent. The fallacy is commonly associated with gambling, where it may be believed, for example, that the next dice roll is more than usually likely to be six because there have recently been fewer than the usual number of sixes.

The term "Monte Carlo fallacy" originates from the best known example of the phenomenon, which occurred in the Monte Carlo Casino in 1913.[1]

8 0

3 years ago

Who can answer this first POINTS AND BRAINLIEST

Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:1.45

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide.

7 0

3 years ago

Sunspots have been observed for many centuries. Records of sunspots from ancient Persian and Chinese astronomers go back thousan

Lunna [17]

Answer:

(a) Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $\mu$ $\leq$ 41

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $\mu$ > 41

(b) The value of z test statistics is 1.08.

(c) We conclude that the mean sunspot activity during the Spanish colonial period was lesser than or equal to 41.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that in a random sample of 40 such periods from Spanish colonial times, the sample mean is x¯ = 47.0. Previous studies of sunspot activity during this period indicate that σ = 35.

It is thought that for thousands of years, the mean number of sunspots per 4-week period was about µ = 41.

Let $\mu$ = mean sunspot activity during the Spanish colonial period.

(a) Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $\mu$ $\leq$ 41 {means that the mean sunspot activity during the Spanish colonial period was lesser than or equal to 41}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $\mu$ > 41 {means that the mean sunspot activity during the Spanish colonial period was higher than 41}

The test statistics that would be used here One-sample z test statistics as we know about the population standard deviation;

T.S. = $\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\bar X$ = sample mean = 47

σ = population standard deviation = 35

n = sample of periods from Spanish colonial times = 40

So, the test statistics = $\frac{47-41}{\frac{35}{\sqrt{40} } }$

= 1.08

(b) The value of z test statistics is 1.08.

(c) Now, the P-value of the test statistics is given by;

P-value = P(Z > 1.08) = 1 - P(Z < 1.08)

= 1 - 0.8599 = 0.1401

Since, the P-value of the test statistics is higher than the level of significance as 0.1401 > 0.05, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which we fail to reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the mean sunspot activity during the Spanish colonial period was lesser than or equal to 41.

8 0

4 years ago

What is the factorization of 36z+60

Zolol [24]

Answer:

12 ( 3z + 5 )

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago