Answer: Cluster analysis
Explanation:
Cluster analysis is the grouping process in which the elements persisting more similarities in nature , characteristics or appearance are gathered as compared to any other group. This type of group is known as cluster.
According to the question, Samuel is using the method of cluster analysis for his research to analyze the behavior of customers. He is making the cluster of women according to the age and their preferences about the purchase of washing machine.
Well if you want to know how it would be not very effective there you go
Answer:
Dan Goeb Patrick
Explanation:
Dan Goeb Patrick is an American radio talk show host and a politician. He is the 42nd and current lieutenant governor of Texas, and he has been serving since January 2015.
He was born in Baltimore, Maryland, USA on April 4, 1950, and he is 69 years of age. He belongs to the Republican party.
Dan Goeb Patrick graduated from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County with a Bachelor of Arts in English, and he is the first member of his family to graduate from college.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
