Answer:
<em>Comparative politics is investigating internal processes within countries or political entities by comparing their characteristics according to a specific model.</em> Though it can potentially address a wide range of aspects, comparative politics is most widely applied to such <em>issues </em>as <u>politics of democratic and authoritarian states</u>, <u>political identit</u>y, <u>regime change</u> and <u>democratization</u>, <u>voting behavior</u> and a number of others.
<em>Comparativists often ask</em> how certain processes, for example, democratization, differ in specific states that still can be placed under the same analysis because they share certain characteristics.
Following the <u>democratization example</u>, let us take post-soviet countries. Comparativists may take most similar countries that share many similarities, such as Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), or most different countries, such as Estonia and Belarus. Here comparativists may ask, why Estonia developed a strong democratic regime, while Belarus fell into a consolidated authoritarian regime.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there were no options attached, we can say the following.
The production by England's Punchdrunk company that was a breakout hit of the 2011-12 season in New York and is considered the leading example of the new genre, the immersive theatre was "Sleep No More."
We are talking about England's Punchdrunk company adaption of William Shakespeare's "McBeth," a classic tragedy that has transcended the test of time.
The premiere of this play was in London, in 2003, and it came to the United States in 2009, in Boston, Massachusetts. This adaptation is very special because there are no seats. The rooms used in the play can be accessed by the public, creating a special sense of participation in the play.
Answer: A) greater rights for common people.
Rousseau argued for a democratic government to rule developed countries. He claimed that the government was in place only through an implicit social contract between the people and the government. This contract ensured that the needs of the people for safety and resources were fulfilled in exchange for the loss of some of their liberties.
However, he argued that in most systems, this contract was broken, because the government was not fulfilling its side of the bargain. According to Rousseau, the power and sovereignty of the country laid with the common people. Therefore, the fulfillment of their common needs and desires (the common will) was the main goal of the state.
I believe the answer is A. have a better self-image
The correct answer is Unlike ethics, these disciplines inquire why people act the way they do.
In the beginning, there was only <u>sociology</u> and <u>psychology</u>. Part of psychology became interested in social and group processes, and so social psychology emerged. That's why the names are related. Social psychology was born from the integration of psychology with sociology.
Sociology, on the other hand, was also interested in the individual processes that psychology was studying. The interaction between people and their environment has become the subject of sociologists' reflection, moving away from other macrosociological approaches. Therefore, we can say that there was a great influence on each other and vice versa.
