yes, because they had more slaves they could get a lot of their work done faster and this helped them produce more materials faster as well. they never ran out of materials because the slaves were always working fast. this made the plantation owners very rich.
"<span>The rejection of the Olive Branch Petition" would be the best option, since this was submitted to Britain before the Declaration in the hopes that the colonies would be able to prevent war but still have Britain address their grievances. </span>
Answer:
that's all I could find from the Internet
Explanation:
Regionalization is defined as an increase in the cross-border flow of capital, goods, and people within a specific geographical area. ... In contrast, regionalism is defined as a political will (hence ism is attached as a suffix) to create a formal arrangement among states on a geographically restricted basis.
Broadly speaking, Mercantilism was very good for European countries for a while but terrible for their colonies.
Mercantilism made people in the Old World VERY rich.
But, as a result of the imbalance, the relationship between the European countries and their colonies deteriorated making mercantilism good in the short term but bad in the long term.
Where are the examples?..
