1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
patriot [66]
2 years ago
13

This person is a New Yorker. She grew up speaking Chinese with her family and learned to speak and read English once she went to

school. Her school never offered Chinese classes and, therefore, she doesn’t know how to read or write in Chinese (English and Chinese have different writing systems). Her life and her values are that of an average American 20-year old, but she also fully embraces the Chinese traditions, placing great value on the family hierarchy and submitting to the larger needs of the family. She also celebrates both American and Chinese holidaysThe following combination describes this person best:
a. monolingual monocultural biliterate
b. bilingual bicultural biliterate
c. bilingual bicultural monoliterate
d. bilingual monocultural monoliterate
Social Studies
1 answer:
Olenka [21]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

b. bilingual bicultural biliterate

You might be interested in
How did the planting of grain and vegetables improve the lives of Neolithic people
JulsSmile [24]
Since they were the ones controling production of food. They were able to produce enough food themselves. Also, civilization started due to people gathered at one place for farming.
8 0
2 years ago
It's possible that someone might have to choose between performing or not performing an action that could lead to serious harm t
Natasha2012 [34]
Criterion 3 known as usefulness

<span>virtue ethics is an approach to Ethics that emphasizes an individual's character as the key element of ethical thinking, rather than rules about the acts themselves  or their consequences.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
IQ Rules the World is group that wants to change how US citizens use the Internet to learn new job skills. They are holding a co
Nuetrik [128]

Julie went through a pre-concept situation, where the leaders of an association she wanted to participate in used her appearance as a way of assessing the skills and abilities she had.

As we already know, people should not be judged on the basis of their appearance, but on the basis of their actions. This situation of prejudice, made Julie upset and sad and caused her, a feeling of revolt that made her join with a friend and make a peaceful protest against the association.

The first constitutional amendment states that every American codadão has the full right to protest peacefully against any situation of injustice and against any institution. For that reason, we can say that Julie can make her protest and that IQ Rules the World cannot stop her.

4 0
3 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
1 year ago
You are about to do a series of interviews about drug abuse and academic performance. In order to make people feel more comforta
Alla [95]

Answer:

False            

Explanation:

Informed consent: In psychology, informed consent make sure that a client, research participant, and a patient is aware of all the possible costs and risks involved in a procedure or treatment.

Informed consent includes:

1. the researcher should tell the participant about the purpose of research, procedure and expected duration.

2. The right to withdraw from the study any time before and after the research has started.

3. Possible consequences.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Kenrick and his colleagues (1989) found that to men who have recently been gazing at centerfolds, average women or even their ow
    12·1 answer
  • Jack Kilby, an engineer at Texas Instruments, helped to bring about cultural change.
    9·1 answer
  • Write a paragraph of South Carolina's history including the 1st settlers in the region,etc Write the economy of South Carolina E
    10·1 answer
  • The use of biotechnological approaches for the improvement of crop plants has been more controversial than their use to prepare
    6·1 answer
  • What advances did early Chinese make
    8·1 answer
  • Which term is used to describe an appreciation for cultural differences that affect communication and the ability to adjust​ one
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER QUICKLY ITS DUE AT 12 AM PLEASE ANSWER ILL BRAINLIEST YOU **its asking me what is my opinion of Confucius view of
    11·1 answer
  • Elephant heart cells have 56 chromosomes. Elephant egg cells have _____.
    12·2 answers
  • Help pls?<br><br> Explain each of the following terms in your own words. <br><br> Stock -
    13·1 answer
  • According to institutional liberal perspective, international migration can be a positive development for both rich and poor nat
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!