The one that best summarizes the Russian economy between 1998 and 2007 was: Its economy was in crisis until the price of oil began to rise.
The communistic regime in Russia has destroyed Russia's economy and killed millions of Russsian Citizen.
In 1998 and 2007, Russia's Government heavily invested in the energy sector and nationalize a lot of Companies in this particular sector of business (mostly oil) and managed to rake in a huge profit when the oil price rises.
The correct answer is C. Senators do not choose who becomes a new senator. They are chosen by the people of that state.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
The first direct evidence of primitive cellular life was the 1977 discovery of <u>microbial </u>fossils in the swartkoppie chert, a type of granular sedimentary rock rich in silica.
Some of Earth's high-quality-preserved fossil microorganisms occur in rocks from the Ediacaran period of geologic time, which runs from about 635 to 541 million years ago. Scientists do not absolutely apprehend how this fragile microorganism became fossils. however, a new experimental look at is now dropping more mild.
Some microorganisms secrete iron-coated sheaths that on occasion fossilize. Others may additionally bore into shells or rocks and shape microscopic canals in the shell; such microorganisms are referred to as endolithic, and their borings can be identified at some point of the Phanerozoic.
The earliest regarded fossils on the planet are putative fossilized microorganisms determined in hydrothermal vent precipitates, taken into consideration to be about three.42 billion years old.
Learn more about fossils here: brainly.com/question/11829803
#SPJ4
Answer:
<em>Zone of proximal development</em>
Explanation:
Zone of proximal development is a stage in a child's development, where the child is provided support to perform a task. It is a level in a child's development which is between the actual development and potential development. This joint learning activity is usually between the child and an older person, who acts as an educator.
<em>Stephen had unsuccessful attempts in assembling the moderately sized jigsaw puzzles on his own and with the help of his older brother he assembled it. Here Stephen engages in joint activity with the brother to solve the puzzle and he falls in the zone of proximal development</em>
