Answer:
Poe presents a more poetic writing and full of adjectives, in addition to the presentation of narration in first person. Chopin, on the other hand, presents a more direct and objective writing, with full exposure of facts and narration in a third person.
Explanation:
While reading the passage written by Poe, we can see that the author was adept at using first-person narration, where the narrator is the main character of the story. In addition, Poe's writing is quite poetic, subjunctive, full of meanings and metaphors, with a strong appeal to sentimentality and full of adjectives.
The reading of the excerpt written by Chopin, presents characteristics totally different from those found in the Poe excerpt. Chopin is a fan of fast, incisive and objective writing, for this reason, we fail to notice the recurrent use of adjectives and metaphors, since the author prefers to establish a clearer and less verbose writing.
The Pilgrims and Puritans establish New World colonies to practice their religions freely.
<h3>Who were the
Pilgrims and
Puritans?</h3>
The Pilgrims were separatists that first settled in Plymouth while the Puritans were non-separatists that joined the migration to establish the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
Hence, they both established the New World colonies to practice their religions freely.
Read more about Pilgrims & Puritans
brainly.com/question/10367782
#SPJ1
Why was the polis such an important part of the Greek life? The polis came to represent the center of Greek identity and its inhabitants were intensely loyal to it. 3. What kinds of government did Greek city-states have between the 700s BC and the late 500s BC?
He divided his kingdom into provinces and had a trusted governor for each one. He also, maintained a large standing army to protect his people.
The failure to mention basic rights<span> soon became a major issue in the subsequent debates over whether or not the proposed </span>Constitution<span> would be ratified, or approved However, the Federalists (those who supported ratification) argued that a </span>bill of rights<span> was unnecessary</span>
