The positive impact of British colonialism in India is related to democracy in the country, which was instituted through British investment in Indian institutions such as courts and universities.
The negative impacts are related to the use of violence by British colonists throughout colonization.
<h3>British India</h3>
It corresponds to the period from 1757 to 1857, in which India was dominated by the British empire, which established colonialism in the country by establishing trading posts and exploiting resources.
Therefore, the positive and negative impacts of colonialism in India are related to the governance system of the British, which despite instituting democratic systems, also used violence and war to increase its control.
Find out more information about British India here:
brainly.com/question/873957
Answer:
Here is a quick overview of each leader and some important notes :)
Explanation:
Osman
Osman was known as the most successful Ghazi. He built a small Muslim state in Anatolia between 1300 and 1326. This expanded from his successors buying land, forming alliances with Emirs, and conquering.
Mehmed II
Mehmed took power in 1451. Him and his army stormed into Constantinople and took over. Mehmed was then called Mehmed the conqueror. He rebuilt Constantinople and let many new people in. This city is now called Istanbul. This helped him gain control of trade. He took on the city in 1453.
Murad II
Murad is Mehmed the first son. Murad defeated Venetians and invaded Hungary. Him and his army were also strong enough to overcome the Italian army. He rebuilt the military after Osman.
Selim the Grim
Selim the Grim came to power in 1512. He swept through many different cities and took over. Selim the Grim took over one city in particular. He took over Cairo, which was the intellectual center of the Muslim world.
Suleyman
Suleyman came to power in 1520. He conquered Belgrade in 1521. The following year, he dominated the whole east Mediterranean. He also conquered much of Europe in 1526. He had become the most powerful monarchs on earth.
Answer: Nationalism was never such a pronounced element in the war; the most perfect and deadly weapon was used.
Explanation:
Nationalism resulting from uneven colonization among European countries is a key factor that led to the war. Never before has nationalism led to such a great conflict as was the First World War case. Nationalism is a product of the 19th century and all its perniciousness during the war. World War I took more casualties than any war before. The use of new technological advances for military purposes has been devastating. Thus, in the First World War, weapons appeared that had never been used in the war before. Tanks, planes, flamethrowers are just some of the new weapons used by the armies.
The republicans believed it was a failure
The Aztecs were known for their agricultural influence in farming. They mostly grew crops such as corn, and their diet was dominated by fruits and vegetables.
