1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Blizzard [7]
3 years ago
7

What was the nature of the aztec administration of subject territories?

History
1 answer:
Whitepunk [10]3 years ago
7 0
Conquered territories were often left relatively unchanged under their old rulers as long as they recognized Aztec supremacy and paid tribute.
Hope this helps

You might be interested in
In order to break the soviet blockade against west berlin in 1948
I am Lyosha [343]

On May 12, 1949, one of the first Cold War crises came to an end. The Soviet Union decides to lift the 11-month-long blockade against West Berlin. The three western sectors of Berlin were unified as West Berlin and placed under West German administration.

7 0
3 years ago
What does Congress do once the requirements of the enabling act are met
spayn [35]
The answer to this question is t<span>hey tell them to make their own condition that follows ours.
Enabling act is a form of legislation that grants an individual/ an entity to take certain actions in the name of government. In most cases, this type of acts is used by government agencies that become the part of the executive branch of the Government.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
PLZ HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLEIST AND 25 POINTS!
GalinKa [24]
It’s less scary now, since we aren’t living through it.
6 0
3 years ago
Where did events like the walking purchase through about treaties between European and native
Gala2k [10]

Answer:

Walking Purchase, (Aug. 25, 1737), land swindle perpetrated by Pennsylvania authorities on the Delaware Indians, who had been the tribe most friendly to William Penn when he founded the colony in the previous century.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
For either Mapp v. Ohio or Miranda v. Arizona, describe the constitutional issue of the case, and explain how the court's ruling
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.

A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • With which sentence would Alexis de Tocqueville likely agree
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the city of savannah during the american revolution
    6·2 answers
  • How did railroads MOST impact farming in the West during the late 1800s
    15·1 answer
  • Country swing music developed in the 1920s and 1930s in what area of the united states?
    13·1 answer
  • The 3 most influential of the Germanic Kingdoms were:
    12·1 answer
  • What factor enabled the spread of lslam
    9·2 answers
  • The first step in the sewage-treatment process is
    10·1 answer
  • How did the fall of the berlin wall affect the US foreign policy<br><br> PLEASE HELP
    5·1 answer
  • What were Kennedy and johnson inspired by from the Great Depression?
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASSSE HELP MAKING BRAINLIEST IF RIGHT
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!