Answer:
Rights are natural and are endowed by the very nature of our existence. It then follows that we cannot be separated from them, they are inalienable. Rights can be abused, restricted in their use or made ineffective but they cannot be removed. A person can be punished for saying something unpopular but short of killing him that person can still say whatever he wants. Since a right is inalienable, it cannot be separated from a person that person cannot transfer it either. What would be the point after all since everyone is equally endowed with the same natural rights.
If that is understood then everything else conferred on us by society then should be recognized as privilege. The first right that applies to your question is the right to equitable treatment. Even the poorest has equal claim on services that are available. The second right in play here is the right to aquire property and to be secure in its ownership. When any outside force whether it is your neighbor or the government attempts to tresspass on your ownership of the property it is theft and a violation of the owner's rights.
To claim the poorest person has a right to services, equitable treatment sustains that right. But to claim that a person who cannot pay for that service but is entitled to it at another's expense is theft.
<h3>
<u>PLEASE</u><u> MARK</u><u> ME</u><u> BRAINLIEST</u></h3>
What motivated Cyclops is how Odysseus's men tricked him and blinded him. This motivated him to ask his father for help his and put a curse on Odysseus's men.
Hope this helped!
;D
Answer:
Montresor plots his revenge upon Fortunato carefully, as he tells the reader in the story. He must "not only punish but punish with impunity;" yet Montresor also recognizes that his satisfaction will be complete only if the murder is undetected and he remains free of incarceration. First, Montresor chooses "the supreme madness of the carnival season" as the backdrop for his plan. He gives no clue to Fortunato that there is even a problem between the two men: Though Montresor claims Fortunato to be his sworn enemy, Fortunato does not seem aware of this, and Montresor continues to "smile in his face" whenever the two men meet. He eliminates the possibility of his own servants as possible witnesses by deliberately lying to them
Explanation:
The answer is variant B verb because it exprime an action made by the subject.
