1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natka813 [3]
2 years ago
12

Much of the anti-Japanese feeling in United States in the 1920s was in California. the opposition included California labor orga

nizations. Why would California workers be against Japanese immigration?
History
2 answers:
lukranit [14]2 years ago
3 0
The japanese would take their jobs, thanks!
Tju [1.3M]2 years ago
3 0

Many of the objections that people have had towards immigration in the past are similar to the ones that are heard nowadays. One of the most common one is the idea of immigrants "taking jobs away" from Americans. This was one of the reasons why California workers were against Japanese immigration.

Japanese people who arrived to California were very aware of the difficulties of making a new life in a new country, and because of this, they were willing to take bad jobs, tolerate abuse and work extremely hard. This made them successful. Many American laborers believed that the success of Japanese immigrants meant that there were less work, wealth or opportunities left for less successful Americans, particularly those who were not willing to tolerate the type of work Japanese immigrants did. This led to negative or hateful feelings towards the Japanese immigrants.

You might be interested in
What does the us allows its citizens to do?
sergejj [24]
I guess that it lets us purchase most of the item in the us market, own land, sell our own items, create our own businesses and things like that.
6 0
2 years ago
What was the long term effect of the “Bleeding Kansas” problem
givi [52]
<span>the north and south became more divided over the issue of slavery

</span>
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the Adams-Onís Treaty do? a. It officially ended the Second Seminole War. b. It gave East Florida to the United States.
DIA [1.3K]
From what I can recall, the Adams-Onis Treaty more or less gave Florida to the U.S. but it did not exactly end the Second Seminole War, which can be made obvious with the fact that there are Seminoles still living in Florida. I don't remember the Treaty having anything to do with the British since this treaty was between Spain and the U.S.


Basically, I believe the answer is B.
4 0
2 years ago
Why did the Kingdom of Israel split?
scZoUnD [109]

Throughout their history in the Promised Land, the children of Israel struggled with conflict among the tribes. The disunity went back all the way to the patriarch Jacob, who presided over a house divided. The sons of Leah and the sons of Rachel had their share of contention even in Jacob’s lifetime (Genesis 37:1-11).


The enmity among the half-brothers continued in the time of the judges. Benjamin (one of Rachel’s tribes) took up arms against the other tribes (Judges 20). Israel’s first king, Saul, was of the tribe of Benjamin. When David was crowned king—David was from the tribe of Judah (one of Leah’s tribes)—the Benjamites rebelled (2 Samuel 2–3). After a long war (2 Samuel 3:1), David succeeded in uniting all twelve tribes (5:1-5).


The frailty of the union was exposed, however, when David’s son Absalom promoted himself as the new king and drew many Israelites away from their allegiance to David (2 Samuel 15). Significantly, Absalom set up his throne in Hebron, the site of the former capital (v. 10). A later revolt was led by a man named Sheba against David and the tribe of Judah (20:1-2).


The reign of David’s son Solomon saw more unrest when one of the king’s servants, Jeroboam, rebelled. Jeroboam was on the king’s errand when he met the prophet Ahijah, who told him that God was going to give him authority over ten of the twelve tribes of Israel. God’s reason for the division of the kingdom was definitive: “Because they have forsaken me . . . and have not walked in my ways.” However, God promised that David’s dynasty would continue, albeit over a much smaller kingdom, for the sake of God’s covenant with David and for the sake of Jerusalem, God’s chosen city. When Solomon learned of the prophecy, he sought to kill Jeroboam, who fled to Egypt for sanctuary (1 Kings 11:26-40).


After Solomon’s death, his son Rehoboam was set to become the next king. Jeroboam returned from Egypt and led a group of people to confront Rehoboam with a demand for a lighter tax burden. When Rehoboam refused the demand, ten of the tribes rejected Rehoboam and David’s dynasty (1 Kings 12:16), and Ahijah’s prophecy was fulfilled. Only Judah and Benjamin remained loyal to King Rehoboam. The northern tribes crowned Jeroboam as their king. Rehoboam made plans to mount an assault on the rebel tribes, but the Lord prevented him from taking that action (vv. 21-24). Meanwhile, Jeroboam further consolidated his power by instituting a form of calf worship unique to his kingdom and declaring that pilgrimages to Jerusalem were unnecessary. Thus, the people of the northern tribes would have no contact with the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.


“So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day” (1 Kings 12:19). The northern kingdom is called “Israel” (or sometimes “Ephraim”) in Scripture, and the southern kingdom is called “Judah.” From the divine viewpoint, the division was a judgment on not keeping God’s commands, specifically the commands prohibiting idolatry. From a human viewpoint, the division was the result of tribal discord and political unrest. The principle is that sin brings division (1 Corinthians 1:13, 11:18; James 4:1).


The good news is that God, in His mercy, has promised a reuniting of the northern and southern kingdoms. “He will raise a banner for the nations / and gather the exiles of Israel; / he will assemble the scattered people of Judah / from the four quarters of the earth. / Ephraim’s jealousy will vanish, / and Judah’s enemies will be destroyed; / Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, / nor Judah hostile toward Ephraim” (Isaiah 11:12-13). When the Prince of Peace—Jesus Christ—reigns in His millennial kingdom, all hostility, jealousy, and conflict among the tribes will be put to rest.


4 0
3 years ago
Chadwick Boseman Played icons and then became one<br> rest in power
storchak [24]

Answer:

rest.........IN POWERR

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If you were president, would you want to fill your cabinet with people who thought like you did, or with people who often disagr
    11·1 answer
  • What is the Elastic Clause? What is the Supremacy
    7·1 answer
  • There is an Army marching towards your city. You need to raise a defending army, build walls around the city, and this has to be
    9·2 answers
  • How william pitt's goals at the beginning of the war compared to what was achieved
    7·2 answers
  • How did Shakespeare die? What evidence or speculations exist pertaining to his death
    11·2 answers
  • ???? PLZ???????????????????????
    9·1 answer
  • What was the political outcome of the Vietnarn War<br>​
    14·1 answer
  • 1This organization started out as a social outlet and educational forum for isolated farm families. It soon became a political v
    7·1 answer
  • Why was slavery important to the economy in the south before the Civil war?​
    6·1 answer
  • Which statements about the influence of transportation advancements on artists in the late 1800s and 1900s are true?.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!