The act of 2000 and the Reauthorization Act of 2003-2005.
this is an <u><em>opinion</em></u> because some people may think there's <em><u>not</u></em> too much standardized testing in schools. then some people might think <em><u>there is</u></em> too much. it all depends on who you ask and what their opinion is.
<em>-ari.</em>
Answer: This is a quote from Joan Claybrook, whose words reflect her steady active citizenship work for a better democracy.
Explanation:
Joan Claybrook worked at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, was the founder and director of the congressional lobbying group Public Citizen’s Congress Watch and emeritus president of Public Citizen, a public interest advocacy nonprofit that works on civil rights and liberties, environmental issues, public participation in governmental decisions, and market accountability.
Answer:
well
Explanation:
If they are not careful the results can be wrong and they might mess up the evidence. The evidence is so critical to what ever they have to solve. Again tho, The results can also be wrong, and they could mess up something really bad.
A.
Some conditions that might have led Samuel's decision to commit a crime could've been students picking him, making fun of him, bullying him. Anything that had to do with other students acting negative to Samuel is what I think is the reason Samuel made this decision.
B.
There's a bunch of things that could've been done to help Samuel. Such as discussing the issue to his parents or sibling, telling the principal what the problem was, etc. Samuel would just need someone to talk to about what was going on, this would probably help him. <em>"Were there signs at school or home that he was at risk? </em><em>I don't understand what this means sorry.</em>
C.
There are barely any at my previous school that I used to attend. Some additional measures that would need to be added would be weapon, drug, etc., detected doors, staff members checking students' bags, etc.