1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lora16 [44]
3 years ago
15

Michael Manin, an airline pilot, was twice convicted of disorderly conduct, a minor misdemeanor. To renew his flight certificati

on with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), Manin filed an application that asked him about his criminal history. He did not disclose his two convictions. When these came to light more than ten years later, Manin argued that he had not known that he was required to report convictions for minor misdemeanors. The NTSB’s policy was to consider an applicant’s understanding of what information a question sought before determining whether an answer was false. But without explanation, the agency departed from this policy, refused to consider Manin’s argument, and revoked his certification. Was this action arbitrary and capricious?
Law
1 answer:
Alina [70]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

arbitrary

Explanation:

Because He had to be awear of it

You might be interested in
Fre.e points because you deserve it
GarryVolchara [31]

Answer:

Tysm

Explanation:

Have a Nice Day

7 0
3 years ago
An arrow signal with a left-pointing arrow _____.
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
ANSWER- a green arrow
8 0
3 years ago
Looking at the response vehicles (pictured above), explain two options you have in order to abide by the Move Over law.
iren2701 [21]
Attach a photo so we can help you out
3 0
3 years ago
because the framers of the united states constitution (written in 1787) believed that protecting property rights relating to inv
ser-zykov [4K]

Because the framers of the United States Constitution (written in 1787) believed that protecting property rights relating to inventions would encourage the new nation’s economic growth, they gave Congress—the national legislature—a constitutional mandate to grant patents for inventions. The resulting patent system has served as a model for those in other nations. Recently, however, scholars have questioned whether the American system helped achieve the framers’ goals. These scholars have contended that from 1794 to roughly 1830, American inventors were unable to enforce property rights because judges were “anticipate” and routinely invalidated patents for arbitrary reasons. This argument is based partly on examination of court decisions in cases where patent holders (“patentees”) brought suit alleging infringement of their patent rights. In the 1820s, for instance, 75 percent of verdicts were decided against the patentee. The proportion of verdicts for the patentee began to increase in the 1830s, suggesting to these scholars that judicial attitudes toward patent rights began shifting then.

To learn more about protecting property rights visit here ; brainly.com/question/28388414?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
What is the advantage of having police officers act as crime-scene investigators ?
katrin [286]

Answer:

there is no advantage

Explanation:

other then the fact that they were there when the crime was commited

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 guarantees certain employees unpaid leave during a family medical emergency.
    8·1 answer
  • Why do you have to be 18 or older, in most states, to drive?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a symptom of carbon monoxide exposure?
    10·1 answer
  • 5. Which of the following is the best definition of
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement describes a difference between authoritarian government
    11·1 answer
  • How do elected officials try to reflect the interests of the citizens they
    7·1 answer
  • Which process does the US Supreme Court follow to make its decisions.
    6·2 answers
  • PLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPL
    12·2 answers
  • Explain the Law
    14·1 answer
  • How is the debate over the legalization of mari***** an issue of federalism?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!