Answer:
$44.25
Explanation:
<u>procedure 1:</u>
we can determine the present value of the stock using the following formula:
present value = future value / (1 + constant growth rate)ⁿ
- future value = $50
- constant growth rate = 13%
- n = 1
present value = $50 / (1 + 13%) = $50 / 1.13 = $44.25
<u>procedure 2 (optional):</u>
future value = future dividend / (required rate of return - constant growth rate)
$50 = future dividend / (18% - 13%)
future dividend = $50 x 5% = $2.50
now we must determine the dividend for the current year:
current dividend = future dividend / (1 + constant growth rate)
current dividend = $2.50 / (1 + 13%) = $2.50 / 1.13 = $2.21
now we apply the Gordon growth model:
present value = dividend / (required rate of return - constant growth rate)
present value = $2.21 / (18% - 13%) = $2.21 / 5% = $44.25
Answer:
The court ruled against both Americar and Regency Inn, and then Regency Inn won its case against Americar. The nuisance case itself is pretty unpleasant, so it's not worth referring to it.
The fundamentals for the ruling against Americar were that they themselves had drafted the lease agreement and that the clause included in the lease agreement by which they agreed to indemnify Regency Inn was valid. The original lease term had already expired, but Americar continued to lease the offices on a monthly basis. Since they never left the place, the clauses in the original agreement were still valid even though the lease changed to a monthly basis. I.e. if you sign a lease contract and after the original contract is over, you continue to lease the same place, then the clauses from the original contract still apply.
The clause stated that Americar was liable for damages that took place on the leased premises or in their proximity, i.e. the area near their offices. The parking lot was considered to be in the proximity of Americar's offices.
Answer:
$6,000 unfavorable
Explanation:
The fixed manufacturing overhead budget for the month is the difference between budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead cost minus actual fixed manufacturing overhead cost represented below;
Fixed manufacturing overhead budget = Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead cost - Actual fixed manufacturing overhead cost
= $70,000 - $76,000
= $6,000 unfavorable
It is unfavorable since the actual overhead cost expended is more than the budgeted cost.
Answer:
The low-attendance day falls on an autumn Wednesday, while the high-attendance day falls on a summer Saturday.
Explanation:
There are no rare class of goods which do not follow the Law of Demand
The most probable reason may be the dates are at different time period, when the demand is lower and therefore the price must be lower to generate enought attendance to make it profitable. While, the second date is onpeak demand.
