Answer:
Read Below
Explanation:
Question: The U.S Constitution required that the treaty be ratified by the U.S Senate under the Cherokee Constitution treaties had to be approved by the Cherokee national council. Did this occur with the treaty of 1835?
Answer: Negotiated in 1835 by a minority party of Cherokees, challenged by the majority of the Cherokee people and their elected government, the Treaty of New Echota was used by the United States to justify the forced removal of the Cherokees from their homelands along what became known as the Trail of Tears. In 1819 the remaining Cherokees who opposed removal negotiated still another treaty. So, yes it did occur in 1835.
Do you think U.S government has the right to enforce this treaty?
Another 130 years would pass before another president of the United States personally delivered a treaty to the Senate. On July 10, 1919, President Woodrow Wilson asked for a quick consent to the Treaty of Versailles. The Senate approved the treaty for ratification on October 20, 1803.
Hopes this Helps :D
Mark me as Brainiest Please : )
Answer:
I. Viewing many television programs that associate successful males with football
III. Operant conditioning
IV. Gender schemata
Explanation:
As we can see in the question above, the boy contracted a very wrong custom of associating virility with his ability and taste for playing football. According to the boy, he is only manly and manly enough boys who like and know how to play football.
This thought (which is extremely wrong) occurs with the influence of some things. The first is the frequency with which this boy watches many television programs that show men, soccer players with a successful and well-established career.
The second influence is the result of operant conditioning, which is a psychological concept characterized by a form of learning that allows a person to associate a situation with a punishment. In this case, the boy associates the lack of skill and the lack of interest in football with words that cause embarrassment as punishment. For this reason, he calls his colleagues who don't like football "sissy".
The third influence occurs through gender schemes, which is a term used to describe the separation of things, activities and behavior as feminine and masculine, in addition to determining that only women can do what is considered feminine and only men can do what it's male. The boy associates football with masculinity and those who do not like or have no interest in football are feminine, effeminate and not men.
Cross-culturally, men tend to place greater emphasis on beauty in their preferences for a mate, and women tend to place greater emphasis on stature in their preferences for a mate
Explanation:
In the evolutionary function of selection partners, men are trying to find women whoa re the most suitable to bear their children, that is the women whoa re fit and look good.
This translates into the beauty standard that the men follow and they look for beautiful women.
The women meanwhile try to look for a man who can provide them with in their pregnancy and then can look after the children so they look for men with stature and the ones that are strong in their group
Answer:d.All of these answers are correct
Explanation:
What are focal adhesions?
Focal adhesions have multi protein structure which forms links between intracellular and extracellular matrix in cells.
They form on moving cells and they grow and mature as the cells keep moving they act as holding points when the cells are moving from one site to another to promote protrusion but supress membrane contractions. In those cells which do not move they act as anchors to keep fell morphology.
Barbour and Wright maintain that when the Supreme Court issues a ruling on the constitutionality of a particular bureaucratic regulation, they are "piecemeal".
<u>Explanation:</u>
It is a piecemeal approach accompanied by unsystematic, partial actions taken over periods. A piecemeal judgment is a document provided by an external auditor expressing a view confined to particular line elements within the financial statements of a corporation. In a situation where complete information is not accessible, an auditor can offer a piecemeal opinion.
For an instance, the defendants pursued a piecemeal investigation strategy in the patent infringement case, examining only the records of selected corporate employees. The district court stated that the method was contradictory to the Federal regulations of Civil Procedure and repeated court orders.
